Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36599179›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of emergency medicine2023

Correlation between prehospital and in-hospital hypotension and outcomes after traumatic brain injury.

Amber D Rice, Chengcheng Hu, Daniel W Spaite, Bruce J Barnhart, Vatsal Chikani, Joshua B Gaither, Kurt R Denninghoff, Gail H Bradley, Jeffrey T Howard, Samuel M Keim and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amber D RiceArizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America. Electronic address: arice@aemrc.arizona.edu.
Chengcheng HuArizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Daniel W SpaiteArizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Bruce J BarnhartArizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America.
Vatsal ChikaniArizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of EMS, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America.
Joshua B GaitherArizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Kurt R DenninghoffArizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Gail H BradleyArizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of EMS, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America.
Jeffrey T HowardDepartment of Public Health, University of Texas at San Antonio, United States of America.
Samuel M KeimArizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Bentley J BobrowDepartment of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX, United States of America.

Funding

Impact of Implementing the EMS Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment GuidelinesR01NS071049 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BOBROW, BENTLEY JORDAN, SPAITE, DANIEL W. · 2011 to 2015
$3.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS071049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveHypotension has a powerful effect on patient outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The relative impact of hypotension occurring in the field versus during early hospital resuscitation is unknown. We evaluated the association between hypotension and mortality and non-mortality outcomes in four cohorts defined by where the hypotension occurred [neither prehospital nor hospital, prehospital only, hospital only, both prehospital and hospital].

methodsSubjects ≥10 years with major TBI were included. Standard statistics were used for unadjusted analyses. We used logistic regression, controlling for significant confounders, to determine the adjusted odds (aOR) for outcomes in each of the three cohorts.

resultsIncluded were 12,582 subjects (69.8% male; median age 44 (IQR 26-61). Mortality by hypotension status: No hypotension: 9.2% (95%CI: 8.7-9.8%); EMS hypotension only: 27.8% (24.6-31.2%); hospital hypotension only: 45.6% (39.1-52.1%); combined EMS/hospital hypotension 57.6% (50.0-65.0%); (p < 0.0001). The aOR for death reflected the same progression: 1.0 (reference-no hypotension), 1.8 (1.39-2.33), 2.61 (1.73-3.94), and 4.36 (2.78-6.84), respectively. The proportion of subjects having hospital hypotension was 19.0% (16.5-21.7%) in those with EMS hypotension compared to 2.0% (1.8-2.3%) for those without (p < 0.0001). Additionally, the proportion of patients with TC hypotension was increased even with EMS "near hypotension" up to an SBP of 120 mmHg [(aOR 3.78 (2.97, 4.82)].

conclusionWhile patients with hypotension in the field or on arrival at the trauma center had markedly increased risk of death compared to those with no hypotension, those with prehospital hypotension that was not resolved before hospital arrival had, by far, the highest odds of death. Furthermore, TBI patients who had prehospital hypotension were five times more likely to arrive hypotensive at the trauma center than those who did not. Finally, even "near-hypotension" in the field was strongly and independently associated the risk of a hypotensive hospital arrival (<90 mmHg). These findings are supportive of the prehospital guidelines that recommend aggressive prevention and treatment of hypotension in major TBI.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticEmergency Medical ServicesHypotensionAdultFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleResuscitationBlood pressureHypotensionPrehospitalTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID36599179
PMCPMC12676271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.