Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36599160›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2023

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Registration and Care Provision of Mental Health Problems in General Practice: Registry-Based Study.

Jan Vandamme, Simon Gabriël Beerten, Jonas Crèvecoeur, Steve Van den Bulck, Bert Aertgeerts, Nicolas Delvaux, Gijs Van Pottelbergh, Mieke Vermandere, Laura Tops, Thomas Neyens and 1 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jan Vandamme *Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8091-8713
Simon Gabriël Beerten *Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3695-2452
Jonas CrèvecoeurLeuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2983-8857
Steve Van den BulckAcademic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0744-3923
Bert AertgeertsAcademic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1142-5402
Nicolas DelvauxAcademic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7335-4075
Gijs Van PottelberghAcademic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4189-3517
Mieke VermandereAcademic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0437-6633
Laura TopsAcademic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4849-3540
Thomas NeyensLeuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2364-7555
Bert VaesAcademic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5244-1930
KU Leuven · BEStatistics Belgium · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in general practice remains uncertain. Several studies showed an increase in terms of mental health problems during the pandemic. In Belgium, especially during the first waves of the pandemic, access to general practice was limited. Specifically, it is unclear how this impacted not only the registration of mental health problems itself but also the care for patients with an existing mental health problem.

objectiveThis study aimed to know the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on (1) the incidence of newly registered mental health problems and (2) the provision of care for patients with mental health problems in general practice, both using a pre-COVID-19 baseline.

methodsThe prepandemic volume of provided care (care provision) for patients with mental health problems was compared to that from 2020-2021 by using INTEGO, a Belgian general practice morbidity registry. Care provision was defined as the total number of new registrations in a patient's electronic medical record. Regression models evaluated the association of demographic factors and care provision in patients with mental health problems, both before and during the pandemic.

resultsDuring the COVID-19 pandemic as compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence of registered mental health problems showed a fluctuating course, with a sharp drop in registrations during the first wave. Registrations for depression and anxiety increased, whereas the incidence of registered eating disorders, substance abuse, and personality problems decreased. During the 5 COVID-19 waves, the overall incidence of registered mental health problems dropped during the wave and rose again when measures were relaxed. A relative rise of 8.7% and 40% in volume of provided care, specifically for patients with mental health problems, was seen during the first and second years of the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively. Care provision for patients with mental health problems was higher in older patients, male patients, patients living in center cities (centrumsteden), patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES), native Belgian patients, and patients with acute rather than chronic mental health problems. Compared to prepandemic care provision, a reduction of 10% was observed in people with a low SES.

conclusionsThis study showed (1) a relative overall increase in the registrations of mental health problems in general practice and (2) an increase in care provision for patients with mental health problems in the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Low SES remained a determining factor for more care provision, but care provision dropped significantly in people with mental health problems with a low SES. Our findings suggest that the pandemic in Belgium was also largely a "syndemic," affecting different layers of the population disproportionately.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PracticeAgedHumansMaleMental HealthPandemicsRegistriescare provisionCOVID-19general practicemental healthsocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID36599160
PMCPMC10039400
OpenAlexW4313487150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read65
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.