ArticleMultivariate behavioral research
The Curious Case of the Cross-Sectional Correlation.
Article in Multivariate behavioral research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stable Co-Occurrence and Time-Specific Within-Person Associations Among Depressive Symptoms, Fear of Negative Evaluation, and Problematic Internet Use in Chinese Adolescents.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Intensive Longitudinal Data Collection Methods in Health Research: Tutorial for Selecting Measures and Designing a Sampling Protocol.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Disentangling within- and between-subject correlations in cognitive models: The essential role of hierarchical estimation.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Precision Imaging for Intraindividual Investigation of the Reward Response.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Precision Imaging for Intraindividual Investigation of the Reward Response.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Does Cluster-Robust Estimation Provide Within-Study Effects? A Comparison of Individual Participant Data Methods in MASEM.Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal · 2025Article
- Alexithymia and Emotion Regulation: the Role of Emotion Intensity.Affective science · 2025Article
- Group-to-individual generalizability and individual-level inferences in cognitive neuroscience.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025Review
- Political Polarization and Wellbeing: Investigating Potential Intrapersonal Harm From Affective Polarization.International review of social psychology · 2025Article
- At-Home Virtual Reality Intervention for Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Single-Case Experimental Design Study.JMIR XR and spatial computing · 2025Article
- Adolescent digital emotion regulation.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2024Review
- Examining the role of personality functioning in a hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology using two years of ambulatory assessed data.Translational psychiatry · 2024Article
- What ergodicity means for you.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Review
- Self-regulatory control processes in youths: A temporal network analysis approach.JCPP advances · 2024Article
- Identifying who benefits most from supportive versus expressive techniques in psychotherapy for depression: Moderators of within- versus between-individual effects.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cross-sectional correlation is frequently used to summarize psychological data, and can be considered the basis for many statistical techniques. However, the work of Peter Molenaar on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.