Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36598687›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2023

Renal resistance index independently predicts worsening of renal function after coronary angiography.

Roberta Barone, Giovanni Goffredo, Vito Di Terlizzi, Gianmarco Alcidi, Erika Tabella, Antonio Centola, Giulio Campanale, Antonio Ruggiero, Andrea Cuculo, Matteo Di Biase and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Roberta BaroneCardiology Unit, Polyclinic University Hospital Riuniti of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giovanni GoffredoCardiology Unit, Polyclinic University Hospital Riuniti of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Vito Di TerlizziCardiology Unit, Polyclinic University Hospital Riuniti of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Gianmarco AlcidiCardiology Unit, Polyclinic University Hospital Riuniti of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Erika TabellaCardiology Unit, Polyclinic University Hospital Riuniti of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Antonio CentolaCardiology Unit, Polyclinic University Hospital Riuniti of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giulio CampanaleCardiology Unit, Polyclinic University Hospital Riuniti of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Antonio RuggieroCardiology Unit, Polyclinic University Hospital Riuniti of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Andrea CuculoCardiology Unit, Polyclinic University Hospital Riuniti of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Matteo Di BiaseCardiology Unit, Polyclinic University Hospital Riuniti of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Natale Daniele BrunettiCardiology Unit, Polyclinic University Hospital Riuniti of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Massimo IacovielloCardiology Unit, Polyclinic University Hospital Riuniti of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. massimo.iacoviello@unifg.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The renal resistance index (RRI) has been demonstrated to be a useful parameter that can detect patients at a high risk of worsening of renal function (WRF). This study was designed to evaluate the role of the RRI in predicting WRF mediated by the intravascular administration of contrast media. We enrolled patients who were referred for coronary angiography. Renal arterial echo-color Doppler was performed to calculate the RRI. WRF was defined as an increase of > 0.3 mg/dL and at least 25% of the baseline value in creatinine concentration 24-48 h after coronary angiography. Among the 148 patients enrolled in this study, 18 (12%) had WRF. In the multivariate logistic analysis, the RRI was independently associated with WRF (odds ratio [OR]: 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.36; p = 0.001). After angiography, the RRI significantly increased in both patients with and without WRF. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for WRF, the RRI at baseline and after angiography showed similar accuracy, and the best cutoff value for predicting WRF was 70%. In patients undergoing coronary angiography, the RRI is independently associated with WRF, probably because it provides more accurate information about cardiorenal pathophysiological factors and reflects kidney hemodynamic status and flow reserve.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryHeart FailureContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyCreatinineHumansKidneyPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisContrast MediaCreatinineAcute kidney injuryBiomarkersCardio-renal syndromeRenal functionRenal resistance index

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.