Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36598655›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2023

Engaging community members in cancer research: an assessment of an NCI-designated cancer center.

Amy E Leader, Rebecca J Melillo, Quincy Greene, Joshua Blanding-Godbolt, Ayako Shimada, Christine M Eischen, Andrew E Aplin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Acceptability and Preliminary Impact of a Cancer-Focused Communication and Community Engagement Training Program for Investigators.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy E LeaderDepartment of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. amy.leader@jefferson.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9514-3631
Rebecca J MelilloSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Quincy GreeneIndependent Contractor, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joshua Blanding-GodboltSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ayako ShimadaDepartment of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christine M EischenSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Andrew E AplinSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

X-Ray Crystallography and Macromolecular CharacterizationP30CA056036 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Chapman · 1995 to 2026
$94.8M
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute P30CA056036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite the importance of engaging community members in research, multiple barriers exist. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation to understand the opportunities and challenges of engaging community members in basic, clinical, translational, and population science research.

methodsWe designed a survey and an interview guide based on the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Surveys were distributed electronically to all cancer center investigators and interviews were conducted virtually with a select group of basic, clinical, and population science investigators. Survey data (n = 77) were analyzed across all respondents using frequency counts and mean scores; bivariate analyses examined differences in responses by research program affiliation, gender, race, and faculty rank. Interviews (n = 16) were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a reflective thematic approach.

resultsThere was strong agreement among investigators that "Community engagement in research will help the SKCC address cancer disparities in the catchment area" (M 4.2, SD 0.9) and less agreement with items such as "I know how to find and connect with community members who I can engage in my research" (M 2.5, SD 1.3). Investigators mentioned challenges in communicating complex science to a lay audience but were open to training and workshops to acquire skills needed to integrate community members into their research.

conclusionCancer centers should develop and promote training and collaborative opportunities for investigators and community members. Overcoming challenges will lead to more patient- and community-centered cancer research in the future.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsResearch DesignHumansCancer researchCommunity engagementImplementation scienceResearch advocacy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.