ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023
Using artificial intelligence to quantify dynamic retraction of brain tissue and the manipulation of instruments in neurosurgery.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The AENEAS Project: Intraoperative Anatomical Guidance Through Real-Time Landmark Detection Using Machine Vision.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Article
- Bridging Generations in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Honoring Legacy and Embracing Technology in The Age of Artificial Intelligence.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Machine Intelligence in Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Computer-vision based analysis of the neurosurgical scene - A systematic review.Brain & spine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is no objective way to measure the amount of manipulation and retraction of neural tissue by the surgeon. Our goal is to develop metrics quantifying dynamic retraction and manipulation by instruments during neurosurgery.
methodsWe trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) to analyze microscopic footage of neurosurgical procedures and thereby generate metrics evaluating the surgeon's dynamic retraction of brain tissue and, using an object tracking process, evaluate the surgeon's manipulation of the instruments themselves. U-Net image segmentation is used to output bounding polygons around cerebral parenchyma of interest, as well as the vascular structures and cranial nerves. A channel and spatial reliability tracker framework is used in conjunction with our CNN to track desired surgical instruments.
resultsOur network achieved a state-of-the-art intersection over union ([Formula: see text]) for biological tissue segmentation. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to evaluate dynamic retraction, tissue handling, and instrument manipulation.
conclusionOur model enables to evaluate dynamic retraction of soft tissue and manipulation of instruments during a surgical procedure, while accounting for movement of the operative microscope. This model can potentially provide the surgeon with objective feedback about the movement of instruments and its effect on brain tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36598652What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.