Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36598627›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Definitive Results with a Long-Term Follow-Up Evaluation.

Emanuele Zarba Meli, Anna De Santis, Giuliana Cortese, Elena Manna, Tiziana Mastropietro, Massimo La Pinta, Andrea Loreti, Floriana Arelli, Paola Scavina, Mauro Minelli and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hot Topics in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emanuele Zarba MeliBreast Center San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy. emanuelezarbameli@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7190-2974
Anna De SantisBreast Center San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Giuliana CorteseDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Elena MannaBreast Center San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Tiziana MastropietroBreast Center San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Massimo La PintaBreast Center San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Andrea LoretiPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Floriana ArelliPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Paola ScavinaMedical Oncology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Mauro MinelliMedical Oncology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Angela Damiana AndrulliRadiotherapy, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Leopoldo CostarelliPathology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Laura BrogliaBreast Radiology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Tatiana PonzaniBreast Radiology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Lucio FortunatoBreast Center San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca PRIN2017 (20178S4EK9)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly used for women with breast cancer who are not candidates for conservative surgery. The authors previously reported satisfying results with NSM after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

methodsFrom 2010 to 2020, 1072 women underwent mastectomy at the authors' institution. In this group, 433 NSMs were performed (40%). The only contraindications to NSM were close proximity to the nipple-areola complex (NAC), bloody discharge, and Paget disease.

resultsIn 112 cases involving 111 women, NSM followed NACT (group 1), whereas it was performed as primary surgery in 321 instances involving 306 women (group 2). At 5 years, local relapse was 7% in group 1 and 2% in group 2, although in the multivariate analysis, locoregional relapses (LRRs) did not differ between the two groups. An increased incidence of local relapse was associated with higher tumor stage (stage III; p = 0.046) and age younger than 51 years (p = 0.038). For 34 (30.3%) of the 111 women in group 1 with a pathologic complete response (pCR), no LRRs were recorded. Only one NAC recurrence was observed. Overall survival with each tumor stage did not differ between the two groups. No differences in complications were observed. Cosmetic results were satisfying in 83.8% of the cases and did not get worse after NACT.

conclusionsThe study data definitively confirm that NSM is safe even after NACT, with good cosmetic results and complications comparable with those in the primary surgery setting. Tumor stage and age were the only independent factors for local relapse. Patients with pCR enjoyed optimal locoregional control.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyMastectomy, SubcutaneousFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNipplesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36598627
OpenAlexW4313489152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.