Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36598555›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2023

Complication rate after pediatric shock wave lithotripsy according to Clavien-Dindo grading system: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature.

Nikolaos Chatzikrachtis, Lazaros Tzelves, Robert Geraghty, Ioannis Manolitsis, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Amelia Pietropaolo, Markos Karavitakis, Marinos Berdempes, Titos Markopoulos, Bhaskar Somani and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Comparison of 2 different fluoroscopy activation intervals in shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nikolaos Chatzikrachtis2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Lazaros Tzelves2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Robert GeraghtyDepartment of Urology, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ioannis Manolitsis2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio Hospital, Athens, Greece. giannismanolit@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1496-0742
Patrick Juliebø-JonesYoung Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Party, 6846, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Amelia PietropaoloYoung Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Party, 6846, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Markos KaravitakisDepartment of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Marinos Berdempes2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Titos Markopoulos2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Bhaskar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Andreas Skolarikos2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeShockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is a minimally invasive technique utilized for renal and ureteric stones in children. Despite being considered safe, certain complications have been recorded. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a pooled analysis of Clavien-Dindo graded complications after SWL in children.

methodsMEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, were screened from inception to 12/02/2022 by two authors independently. Only randomized controlled trials providing Clavien-Dindo classification or relevant clinical information were considered eligible. Overall complications were calculated using the aggregate number of each complication divided by the total number of patients in studies with data.

resultsPooled analysis revealed that from children treated with SWL, 27.7% [95% CI 13.1-49.4] suffered Clavien I complications, 4.9% [95% CI 3.1-7.6] Clavien II complications, 2.7% [95% CI 1.6-4.7] Clavien III complications, 2.3% [95% CI 1.3-4] Clavien IV complications, while no Clavien V complications were recorded. In total, 28.1% [95% CI 15.6-45.3] of children suffered minor complications (Clavien-Dindo I-II), while 3% [95% CI 1.8-5] major complications (Clavien-Dindo III-V). Pooled analysis revealed that 10.7% [95% CI 3.2-30.1] of patients suffered macroscopic hematuria, 7.3% [95% CI 2.1-22.7] pain, 5.5% [95% CI 3.3-9] steinstrasse, 5.3% [95% CI 3-9.3] fever, 2.2% [95% CI 0.8-5.6] sepsis, 1.1% [95% CI 0.3-3.7] urinoma, 1% [95% CI 0.4-2.7] symptomatic hematoma and 1% [95% CI 0.3-2.7] asymptomatic hematoma. Need for re-treatment was 42.6% [95% CI 31.4-54.7] and need for auxiliary procedures was 11.8% [95% CI 8.5-16.1].

conclusionSWL is an irreplaceable tool for treating urolithiasis in children. Although a minimally invasive technique, parents and children should be adequately informed about the risk of minor/major complications.

Indexed as

LithotripsyUreteral CalculiUrolithiasisChildHematuriaHumansClavien–Dindo gradingPediatric urologyShock wave lithotripsy complicationsUrolithiasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.