ArticleClinical neuroradiology2023
Applicability of the Edinburgh CT Criteria for Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage Associated with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Island Sign on Computed Tomography Is Associated With Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Sex differences in imaging features including cerebral amyloid angiopathy markers in intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in stroke · 2026Article
- Updated imaging markers in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: What radiologists need to know.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Imaging Interstitial Fluids and Extracellular Matrix in Cerebrovascular Disorders: Current Perspectives and Clinical Applications.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2025Review
- The probability of cerebral amyloid angiopathy according to the Simplified Edinburgh CT criteria in a large, unselected lobar intracerebral hemorrhage population.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Apolipoprotein E genotype is associated with island sign in lobar intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBased on histopathology, Edinburgh diagnostic criteria were proposed to consider a nontraumatic intracerebral lobar hemorrhage (ICH) as related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) using the initial computed tomography (CT) scan and the APOE genetic status. We aimed to externally validate the Edinburgh prediction model, excluding the APOE genotyping and based on the modified Boston criteria on the MRI for CAA diagnosis
methodsWe included patients admitted for spontaneous lobar ICH in the emergency department between 2016 and 2019 who underwent noncontrast CT scan and MRI. According to the MRI, patients were classified into the CAA group or into the non-CAA group in the case of other causes of ICH. Two neuroradiologists, blinded to the final retained diagnosis, rated each radiological feature on initial CT scan described in the Edinburgh study on initial CT scan
resultsA total of 102 patients were included, of whom 36 were classified in the CAA group, 46 in the non-CAA causes group and 20 of undetermined cause (excluded from the primary analysis). The Edinburgh prediction model, including finger-like projections and subarachnoid extension showed an area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) of 0.760 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.660-0.859) for the diagnosis of CAA. The AUC reached 0.808 (95% CI: 0.714-0.901) in a new prediction model integrating a third radiologic variable: the ICH cortical involvement.
conclusionUsing the Boston MRI criteria as a final assessment, we provided a new external confirmation of the radiological Edinburgh CT criteria, which are directly applicable in acute settings of spontaneous lobar ICH and further proposed an original 3‑set model considering finger-like projections, subarachnoid extension, and cortical involvement that may achieve a high discrimination performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.