ArticleIUCrJ2023
Learning to automate cryo-electron microscopy data collection with Ptolemy.
Article in IUCrJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- EMhub: a web platform for data management and on-the-fly processing in scientific facilities.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024Article
- Smart parallel automated cryo-electron tomography.Nature methods · 2024Article
- SPOT-RASTR-A cryo-EM specimen preparation technique that overcomes problems with preferred orientation and the air/water interface.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Article
- Cryo-electron microscopy-based drug design.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Review
- Cryo-Electron Microscopy Screening Automation across Multiple Grids using Smart Leginon.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023Article
- nextPYP: a comprehensive and scalable platform for characterizing protein variability in situ using single-particle cryo-electron tomography.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- The progressive spectral signal-to-noise ratio of cryo-electron micrograph movies as a tool to assess quality and radiation damage.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade, cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) has emerged as an important method for determining near-native, near-atomic resolution 3D structures of biological macromolecules. To meet the increasing demand for cryoEM, automated methods that improve throughput and efficiency of microscope operation are needed. Currently, the targeting algorithms provided by most data-collection software require time-consuming manual tuning of parameters for each grid, and, in some cases, operators must select targets completely manually. However, the development of fully automated targeting algorithms is non-trivial, because images often have low signal-to-noise ratios and optimal targeting strategies depend on a range of experimental parameters and macromolecule behaviors that vary between projects and collection sessions. To address this, Ptolemy provides a pipeline to automate low- and medium-magnification targeting using a suite of purpose-built computer vision and machine-learning algorithms, including mixture models, convolutional neural networks and U-Nets. Learned models in this pipeline are trained on a large set of images from real-world cryoEM data-collection sessions, labeled with locations selected by human operators. These models accurately detect and classify regions of interest in low- and medium-magnification images, and generalize to unseen sessions, as well as to images collected on different microscopes at another facility. This open-source, modular pipeline can be integrated with existing microscope control software to enable automation of cryoEM data collection and can serve as a foundation for future cryoEM automation software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.