Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36598342›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2023

A randomized controlled trial on the effects of "Global Postural Re-education" versus neck specific exercise on pain, disability, postural control, and neuromuscular features in women with chronic non-specific neck pain.

Tânia Mendes Fernandes, Roberto Méndez-Sánchez, Ana S Puente-González, Francisco J Martín-Vallejo, Deborah Falla, Carolina Vila-Chã

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07426588 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Thoracic Extension and Global Postural Corrective Exercises on Individuals With Hyper Kyphosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsHyperkyphosisArmsThoracic Extension Exercises, Global Postural corrective Exercises, Standard Physical Therapy
NCT07438548 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of an Eye-cervical Re-education and Motor Control Training Program on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Chronic Neck Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled52ConditionsChronic Neck PainArmsEye-cervical Re-education Program, Motor Control Training Program, Standardized Physiotherapy Treatment
NCT07528248 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Global Postural Re-education and NASM-based Corrective Exercises in Patients With Upper Cross Syndrome (UCS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRehana HayatRan2026 to 2026Enrolled46ConditionsUpper Cross SyndromeArmsGlobal Postural Re-education, NASM-based Corrective exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Effectiveness of Global Postural Reeducation in Postural Changes and Postural Stability in Young Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tânia Mendes FernandesCentro EMA, Guarda, Portugal.
Roberto Méndez-SánchezDepartment of Nursing and Physical Therapy, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Ana S Puente-GonzálezDepartment of Nursing and Physical Therapy, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Francisco J Martín-VallejoInstitute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Deborah FallaCenter of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Carolina Vila-ChãSports Department, Polytechnic Institute of Guarda, Guarda, Portugal - cvilacha@ipg.pt.
Instituto Politécnico da Guarda · PTUniversidad de Salamanca · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ESUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeck pain is associated with decreased health-related quality of life, decreased work productivity, and increased visits to health care providers.

aimThe aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of "Global Postural Re-education" (GPR) versus a neck specific exercise (SE) program on neck pain, disability, cervical range of movement, postural stability, and activity of the superficial cervical flexor muscles.

designA parallel-group and single-blinded clinical trial.

settingCommunity interventions. POPULATION: Fifty women with non-specific chronic neck pain (NSCNP).

methodsParticipants were randomly assigned to one of the two intervention groups (GPR [N.=25] or SE [N.=25]). Both interventions consisted of eight sessions of ~40 minutes duration, performed twice a week, for four weeks. Outcomes included neck pain intensity and disability, cervical range of motion (CROM), postural sway, and activity of the superficial neck flexor muscles during a cranio-cervical flexion test (CCFT). All outcomes were assessed twice before the intervention and immediately following eight treatment sessions over four weeks.

resultsBoth interventions were equally effective in reducing neck pain (P<0.001, ŋp

conclusionsOur results revealed that GPR and SE induced significant positive results in all measures apart from postural stability but with no difference between the interventions. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: "Global Postural Re-education" (GPR) and neck SE interventions are equally effective in reducing neck pain and disability, and improving neck mobility in women with NSCNP. Overall, this study indicates that GPR and SE interventions can be used to effectively manage patients with NSCNP.

Indexed as

Chronic PainNeck PainExercise TherapyFemaleHumansPostural BalanceQuality of LifeRange of Motion, Articular

Identifiers

PMID36598342
PMCPMC10035445
OpenAlexW4313489008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.