Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36598147›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023

Odor encoding by signals in the olfactory bulb.

Justus V Verhagen, Keeley L Baker, Ganesh Vasan, Vincent A Pieribone, Edmund T Rolls

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Survey of temporal coding of sensory information.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Justus V VerhagenThe John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-6090-0073
Keeley L BakerThe John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-454X
Ganesh VasanThe John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-6612-7739
Vincent A PieriboneThe John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-5836-5454
Edmund T RollsOxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-1292
Yale University · USUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Genetically Encoded Localization Modules for Targeting Activity Probes to Specific Subcellular Sites in Brain NeuronsU01NS099714 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TRIMMER, JAMES S · 2016 to 2018
$3.4M
High Throughput of Protein-based Voltage ProbesU01NS103517 · NINDS · JOHN B. PIERCE LABORATORY, INC. · PI PIERIBONE, VINCENT A · 2017 to 2019
$2.4M
Multimodal flavor integration and retronasal olfaction in the mouseR01DC014723 · NIDCD · JOHN B. PIERCE LABORATORY, INC. · PI VERHAGEN, JUSTUS V. · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
Bulbar maps to retronasal smell by optical calcium imaging and fMRI in acute ratR01DC011286 · NIDCD · JOHN B. PIERCE LABORATORY, INC. · PI VERHAGEN, JUSTUS V. · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC011286NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014723NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC014723NIH HHS NS099714NIH HHS NS103517NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS099714NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS103517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the operation of the olfactory system, it is essential to know how information is encoded in the olfactory bulb. We applied Shannon information theoretic methods to address this, with signals from up to 57 glomeruli simultaneously optically imaged from presynaptic inputs in glomeruli in the mouse dorsal (dOB) and lateral (lOB) olfactory bulb, in response to six exemplar pure chemical odors. We discovered that, first, the tuning of these signals from glomeruli to a set of odors is remarkably broad, with a mean sparseness of 0.83 and a mean signal correlation of 0.64. Second, both of these factors contribute to the low information that is available from the responses of even populations of many tens of glomeruli, which was only 1.35 bits across 33 glomeruli on average, compared with the 2.58 bits required to perfectly encode these six odors. Third, although there is considerable interest in the possibility of temporal encoding of stimulus including odor identity, the amount of information in the temporal aspects of the presynaptic glomerular responses was low (mean 0.11 bits) and, importantly, was redundant with respect to the information available from the rates. Fourth, the information from simultaneously recorded glomeruli asymptotes very gradually and nonlinearly, showing that glomeruli do not have independent responses. Fifth, the information from a population became available quite rapidly, within 100 ms of sniff onset, and the peak of the glomerular response was at 200 ms. Sixth, the information from the lOB was not additive with that of the dOB.

Indexed as

OdorantsOlfactory BulbAnimalsMiceOlfactory PathwaysSmellinformation encodingmouseolfactory bulbrate encodingtemporal encoding

Identifiers

PMID36598147
PMCPMC9925169
OpenAlexW4313488488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.