Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597953›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurointerventional surgery2023

Simplified stroke imaging selection modality for endovascular thrombectomy in the extended time window: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zimei Dong, Shan Deng, Jian Zhang, Shijian Chen, Ziming Ye, Limei Zhang, Ruiting Hu, Cai Zhong, Xiuying Liu, Chao Qin

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zimei Dong *Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Shan Deng *Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Shijian ChenDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Ziming YeDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Limei ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, People's Hospital of Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Chuxiong, Yunnan, China.
Ruiting HuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Cai ZhongDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4624-5110
Xiuying LiuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Chao QinDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China chaoqin202012@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9729-8506
Guangxi Medical University · CNSecond People’s Hospital of Yibin · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of imaging selection modality on clinical outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the 6-24-hour time window remains undetermined. We compared the clinical outcomes of a simplified stroke imaging selection modality using non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT)±CT angiography (CTA) with using advanced CT perfusion (CTP).

methodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 1 May 2022 to compare NCCT±CTA and CTP for patient selection for EVT in late-presenting stroke with large vessel occlusions (LVO). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) within 180 days. The secondary outcomes included mortality within 90 days, successful recanalization, and any intracranial hemorrhage.

resultsA total of 3419 patients in six articles were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between NCCT±CTA (no-CTP) and CTP in functional independence either in overall or subgroup analysis. However, the mortality in the no-CTP group was higher than in the CTP group. Furthermore, within the DAWN/DEFUSE 3-like subgroup, there were no significant differences in mortality, successful recanalization, and any intracranial hemorrhage between the two groups.

conclusionThere was no significant difference between the simplified NCCT±CTA modality and the advanced CTP modality. The use of NCCT±CTA may represent a reasonable option for selecting patients for EVT in the extended time window, especially in the absence of CTP and acute phase MRI capabilities.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresStrokeComputed Tomography AngiographyHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeCTCT AngiographyCT perfusionStrokeThrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID36597953
PMCPMC10803987
OpenAlexW4311829880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.