Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597870›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology2023

Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Online and App Activities for People Living With Dementia and Their Supporters.

Abigail R Lee, Orii McDermott, Martin Orrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abigail R LeeMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2931-8111
Orii McDermottMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Martin OrrellMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStigma often surrounds people with dementia when it comes to use of computer technology, although evidence does not always support this. More understanding is needed to investigate attitudes and experience in relation to computer technology use among those living with dementia and their readiness to use it to support self-management.

methodsAn online self-report questionnaire was completed by adults living with a dementia diagnosis and those living with them. Questions explored how long the participants had been using computer technology; how regularly they used it; the popularity of common communication apps; and whether they were interested in using an app to support their independence.

results47 participants with dementia and 62 supporters responded to the questionnaire. There were no obvious differences between those with dementia and supporters when it came to regular technology usage and both groups showed positive attitudes to the use of it for independence in dementia.

conclusionsThere was active use of computer technology among this population. Benefits were shown to include communication, increasing individuals' understanding of dementia diagnoses, and enabling independent activities for both those with dementia and supporters.

Indexed as

DementiaMobile ApplicationsHumansSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnairescomputer technologydementiaindependenceonlinequality of lifequestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID36597870
PMCPMC10394950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.