Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597699›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2023

Intervention treatment distributions that depend on the observed treatment process and model double robustness in causal survival analysis.

Lan Wen, Julia L Marcus, Jessica G Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Grace periods in comparative effectiveness studies of sustained treatments.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lan WenDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, 8430University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6120-8492
Julia L MarcusDepartment of Population Medicine, 1811Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jessica G YoungDepartment of Population Medicine, 1811Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Population-Level Effects of Increasing PrEP Uptake on HIV and Bacterial STIsR21AI143386 · NIAID · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI MARCUS, JULIA L., YOUNG, JESSICA GERALD · 2019 to 2020
$469k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI143386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generalized g-formula can be used to estimate the probability of survival under a sustained treatment strategy. When treatment strategies are deterministic, estimators derived from the so-called efficient influence function (EIF) for the g-formula will be doubly robust to model misspecification. In recent years, several practical applications have motivated estimation of the g-formula under non-deterministic treatment strategies where treatment assignment at each time point depends on the observed treatment process. In this case, EIF-based estimators may or may not be doubly robust. In this paper, we provide sufficient conditions to ensure the existence of doubly robust estimators for intervention treatment distributions that depend on the observed treatment process for point treatment interventions and give a class of intervention treatment distributions dependent on the observed treatment process that guarantee model doubly and multiply robust estimators in longitudinal settings. Motivated by an application to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) initiation studies, we propose a new treatment intervention dependent on the observed treatment process. We show there exist (1) estimators that are doubly and multiply robust to model misspecification and (2) estimators that when used with machine learning algorithms can attain fast convergence rates for our proposed intervention. Finally, we explore the finite sample performance of our estimators via simulation studies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, StatisticalComputer SimulationProbabilitySurvival AnalysisCausal inferencedouble robustnessestimating equationsobservational studystochastic treatment strategies

Identifiers

PMID36597699
PMCPMC9983057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.