Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597692›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Adapting to the Sound of Music - Development of Music Discrimination Skills in Recently Implanted CI Users.

Alberte B Seeberg, Niels T Haumann, Andreas Højlund, Anne S F Andersen, Kathleen F Faulkner, Elvira Brattico, Peter Vuust, Bjørn Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Meludia platform as a tool to evaluate music perception in pediatric and adult cochlear implant users.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alberte B SeebergCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Music in the Brain, 1006Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4604-1791
Niels T HaumannCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Music in the Brain, 1006Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andreas HøjlundCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8460-8635
Anne S F AndersenCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Music in the Brain, 1006Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kathleen F FaulknerOticon Medical, Smørum, Denmark.
Elvira BratticoCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Music in the Brain, 1006Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.
Peter VuustCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Music in the Brain, 1006Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bjørn PetersenCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Music in the Brain, 1006Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) are optimized for speech perception but poor in conveying musical sound features such as pitch, melody, and timbre. Here, we investigated the early development of discrimination of musical sound features after cochlear implantation. Nine recently implanted CI users (CIre) were tested shortly after switch-on (T1) and approximately 3 months later (T2), using a musical multifeature mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm, presenting four deviant features (intensity, pitch, timbre, and rhythm), and a three-alternative forced-choice behavioral test. For reference, groups of experienced CI users (CIex;

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsMusicAuditory PerceptionHumansPitch DiscriminationPitch Perceptionauditory discriminationcochlear implantsmismatch negativitymusic perceptionneural plasticity

Identifiers

PMID36597692
PMCPMC9830578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.