Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597677›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2023

Key Elements of Enhanced Recovery after Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Reanalysis of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Guidelines.

Chen Changjun, Zhao Xin, Luo Yue, Chen Liyile, Kang Pengde

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06982625 (Supra Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block as Rescue Analgesia Following Total Hip Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06982625 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Supra Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block as Rescue Analgesia Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut Mutualiste MontsourisRan2025 to 2027Enrolled310ConditionsHip Arthroplasty, Total, Post Operative Pain, Acute, Nerve BlockArmsUltrasound guided supra inguinal fascia iliaca block, Placebo Injection, Surgical and anesthetic protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chen ChangjunDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4198-7177
Zhao XinDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.
Luo YueDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.
Chen LiyileDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.
Kang PengdeDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7042-6731

Funding

1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University ZYJC18040National Natural Science Foundation of China 81974333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent guidelines have produced a consensus statement for perioperative care in hip and knee replacement. However, there is still a need for reanalysis of the evidence and recommendations. Therefore, we retrieved and reanalyzed the evidence of each recommended components of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) based on the guidelines of total joint arthroplasty. For each one, we included for the highest levels of evidence and those systematic reviews and meta-analyses were preferred. The full texts were analyzed and the evidence of all components were summarized. We found that most of the recommended components of ERAS are supported by evidence, however, the implementation details of each recommended components need to be further optimized. Therefore, implementation of a full ERAS program may maximize the benefits of our clinical practice but this combined effect still needs to be further determined.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryGuidelines as TopicHumansPerioperative CareEnhanced recovery after surgeryEvidence-based reviewPerioperative careTotal hip arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36597677
PMCPMC9977593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.