Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597646›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2022

Description of the Diversity in Surgical Indication and Surgical Strategies for Primary Spinal Cord Tumors: A Nationwide Survey by the Neurospinal Society of Japan.

Yasukazu Hijikata, Shigeo Ueda, Takao Yasuhara, Daisuke Umebayashi, Toshiki Endo, Toshihiro Takami, Masaki Mizuno, Kazutoshi Hida, Minoru Hoshimaru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yasukazu HijikataSpine and Low Back Pain Center, Kitasuma Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Shigeo UedaShin-Aikai Spine Center, Katano Hospital, Katano, Japan.
Takao YasuharaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Daisuke UmebayashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshiki EndoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan.
Toshihiro TakamiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Masaki MizunoDepartment of Minimum-Invasive Neurospinal Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.
Kazutoshi HidaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sapporo Azabu Neurosurgical Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Minoru HoshimaruShin-Aikai Spine Center, Katano Hospital, Katano, Japan.

Funding

Neurospinal Society of Japan
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the current management of primary spinal cord tumors (PSCTs) and determine whether and to what extent there are differences in surgical strategies for PSCTs.

methodsThe Neurospinal Society of Japan conducted a survey between April 1 and 30, 2021. Certified spine surgeons were requested for information on the frequency of surgeries in 2020 and the surgical strategies adopted for each PSCTs. The following tumor histologies were focused: schwannoma, meningioma, and cauda equina tumor as extramedullary tumors; and ependymoma, hemangioblastoma, astrocytoma, and cavernoma as intramedullary tumors. The participants were divided according to their response as follows: experts, who had experienced ≥ 100 surgeries for PSCTs, and nonexperts.

resultsAmong 308 participants (63%), 35 (11%) were experts. The total number of PSCTs in 2020 was 802 of which 564 tumors were extramedullary and 223 were intramedullary. Schwannoma accounted for 53% of the extramedullary tumors, and ependymoma accounted for 39% of the intramedullary tumors. Surgical strategies significantly differed among both the experts and nonexperts groups. Some discrepancies in the adopted surgical strategies were observed between groups. Some of the nonexperts, and none of the experts, ruled out surgery for schwannomas (Eden type 4), astrocytomas, or cavernomas. Five nonexperts (2.2%), and none of the experts, resected the entire dura for meningiomas.

conclusionA nationwide survey revealed that a sufficient consensus did not exist regarding surgical strategies for PSCTs. A disease-specific registry for PSCTs is necessary in academic societies.

Indexed as

General surgeryRegistriesSpinal cord neoplasmsSurgical strategySurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36597646
PMCPMC9816577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.