Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597524›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2022

Study COVID-19 Severity of Patients Admitted to Emergency Room (ER) with Chest X-ray Images.

Jonathan Stubblefield, Christopher Saldivar, Anna De Feria, James Riddle, Abhijit Shivkumar, Jason Causey, Jake Qualls, Jennifer Fowler, Xiuzhen Huang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonathan StubblefieldCenter for No-Boundary Thinking (CNBT), Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas.
Christopher SaldivarCenter for No-Boundary Thinking (CNBT), Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas.
Anna De FeriaThe Joint Translational Research Lab of Arkansas State University and St. Bernards Medical Center, Jonesboro, Arkansas.
James RiddleThe Joint Translational Research Lab of Arkansas State University and St. Bernards Medical Center, Jonesboro, Arkansas.
Abhijit ShivkumarThe Joint Translational Research Lab of Arkansas State University and St. Bernards Medical Center, Jonesboro, Arkansas.
Jason CauseyCenter for No-Boundary Thinking (CNBT), Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas.
Jake QuallsCenter for No-Boundary Thinking (CNBT), Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas.
Jennifer FowlerCenter for No-Boundary Thinking (CNBT), Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas.
Xiuzhen HuangCenter for No-Boundary Thinking (CNBT), Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas.

Funding

Understanding Hesitant AdoptersP20GM103429 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Stephanie Diane Hayes · 2012 to 2026
$60.9M
Biomedical Computing and Informatics Strategies for Precision MedicineR01LM012601 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HUANG, XIUZHEN, MOORE, JASON H. · 2017 to 2020
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103429NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have conducted a study of the COVID-19 severity with the chest x-ray images, a private dataset collected from our collaborator St Bernards Medical Center. The dataset is comprised of chest x-ray images from 1,550 patients who were admitted to emergency room (ER) and were all tested positive for COVID-19. Our study is focused on the following two questions: (1) To predict patients hospital staying duration, based on the chest x-ray image which was taken when the patient was admitted to the ER. The length of stay ranged from zero hours to 95 days in the hospital and followed a power law distribution. Based on our testing results, it is hard for the prediction models to detect strong signal from the chest x-ray images. No model was able to perform better than a trivial most-frequent classifier. However, each model was able to outperform the most-frequent classifier when the data was split evenly into four categories. This would suggest that there is signal in the images, and the performance may be further improved by the addition of clinical features as well as increasing the training set. (2) To predict if a patient is COVID-19 positive or not with the chest x-ray image. We also tested the generalizability of training a prediction model on chest x-ray images from one hospital and then testing the model on images captures from other sites. With our private dataset and the COVIDx dataset, the prediction model can achieve a high accuracy of 95.9%. However, for our hold-one-out study of the generalizability of the models trained on chest x-rays, we found that the model performance suffers due to a significant reduction in training samples of any class.

Indexed as

Chest x-rayDeep-learning modelEmergency room (ER) patient classification

Identifiers

PMID36597524
PMCPMC9810237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.