ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2022
Study COVID-19 Severity of Patients Admitted to Emergency Room (ER) with Chest X-ray Images.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have conducted a study of the COVID-19 severity with the chest x-ray images, a private dataset collected from our collaborator St Bernards Medical Center. The dataset is comprised of chest x-ray images from 1,550 patients who were admitted to emergency room (ER) and were all tested positive for COVID-19. Our study is focused on the following two questions: (1) To predict patients hospital staying duration, based on the chest x-ray image which was taken when the patient was admitted to the ER. The length of stay ranged from zero hours to 95 days in the hospital and followed a power law distribution. Based on our testing results, it is hard for the prediction models to detect strong signal from the chest x-ray images. No model was able to perform better than a trivial most-frequent classifier. However, each model was able to outperform the most-frequent classifier when the data was split evenly into four categories. This would suggest that there is signal in the images, and the performance may be further improved by the addition of clinical features as well as increasing the training set. (2) To predict if a patient is COVID-19 positive or not with the chest x-ray image. We also tested the generalizability of training a prediction model on chest x-ray images from one hospital and then testing the model on images captures from other sites. With our private dataset and the COVIDx dataset, the prediction model can achieve a high accuracy of 95.9%. However, for our hold-one-out study of the generalizability of the models trained on chest x-rays, we found that the model performance suffers due to a significant reduction in training samples of any class.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.