ArticleInternational journal of women's health2022
Determinants of Disagreement with Female Genital Mutilation Among Mothers.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Female genital mutilation: prevalence and factors associated with its type among women of reproductive age group in Somaliland: further analysis of 2020 Demographic and Health Survey Data.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Mental health outcomes and post-traumatic stress disorder associated with female genital mutilation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Do Attitude, Awareness and Intention to Perform Female Genital Mutilation or Cutting for Their Daughters of Women Healthcare Providers Differ from Mothers in Somalia?International journal of women's health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is widely practiced in Somalia. Limited data are available on the attitude of the Somalia community regarding FGM. The present study aimed to explore the attitude of mothers toward the practice of FGM. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to July 2021 among mothers attending outpatient clinics at a tertiary referral hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia. Results: A total of 247 participants were included, 65.2% of whom believed this practice should be continued. The most cited reason reported regarding FGM was a requirement for religion (90.7%). About 73.9% of mothers stated that the most cited reason reported regarding the abandonment of FGM was health complications. About 59.8% of the study participants thought that FGM could be stopped through education. The results revealed that women who graduated from primary school (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.090-4.51), who had no social media account (OR: 2.305; 95% CI: 1.147-4.633), and women who were circumcised by a traditional birth attendant (OR: 4.55; 95% CI: 1.57-13.22) were more likely to think that FGM should be continued compare with their counterparts. Conclusions: We found that mothers who were less educated, had no social account and those circumcised by a traditional birth attendant had more positive attitudes toward FGM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.