Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597478›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2022

Determinants of Disagreement with Female Genital Mutilation Among Mothers.

Esra Keles, Hasan Huseyin Eker, Guven Bektemur, Ifrah Adan Hilowle, Mohamed Mukhtar Kassim, Mohamed Abdulkadir Hassan-Kadle, Ali Adali, Şeyma Karaketir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Esra KelesDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Kartal Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-8883
Hasan Huseyin EkerDepartment of Public Health, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Mogadishu Somalia-Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Training and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0000-0002-9053-0835
Guven BektemurDepartment of Public Health, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Faculty of Hamidiye Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5899-566X
Ifrah Adan HilowleDepartment of Education, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Mogadishu Somalia-Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Training and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0000-0002-8906-0821
Mohamed Mukhtar KassimDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Mogadishu Somalia-Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Training and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0000-0003-3316-5162
Mohamed Abdulkadir Hassan-KadleCollege of Medicine and Health Science, Abrar University, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0000-0003-2304-6135
Ali AdaliDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Mogadishu Somalia-Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Training and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0000-0002-6076-9933
Şeyma KaraketirDepartment of Public Health, Istanbul University, Occupational Health Training Programme, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University · TRAbrar University · SODr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIstanbul University · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is widely practiced in Somalia. Limited data are available on the attitude of the Somalia community regarding FGM. The present study aimed to explore the attitude of mothers toward the practice of FGM. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to July 2021 among mothers attending outpatient clinics at a tertiary referral hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia. Results: A total of 247 participants were included, 65.2% of whom believed this practice should be continued. The most cited reason reported regarding FGM was a requirement for religion (90.7%). About 73.9% of mothers stated that the most cited reason reported regarding the abandonment of FGM was health complications. About 59.8% of the study participants thought that FGM could be stopped through education. The results revealed that women who graduated from primary school (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.090-4.51), who had no social media account (OR: 2.305; 95% CI: 1.147-4.633), and women who were circumcised by a traditional birth attendant (OR: 4.55; 95% CI: 1.57-13.22) were more likely to think that FGM should be continued compare with their counterparts. Conclusions: We found that mothers who were less educated, had no social account and those circumcised by a traditional birth attendant had more positive attitudes toward FGM.

Indexed as

educationfemale genital cuttingfemale genital mutilationSomalia

Identifiers

PMID36597478
PMCPMC9805744
OpenAlexW4313456894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.