Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597410›Full record

ReviewVeterinary medicine and science2023

Update on canine anorchia: A review.

Vincenzo Cicirelli, Matteo Burgio, Daniela Mrenoshki, Sandor Cseh, Giulio Aiudi, Giovanni Michele Lacalandra

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary medicine and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Update on canine anorchia: A review.Veterinary medicine and science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincenzo CicirelliDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldi Moro, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2792-8848
Matteo BurgioDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldi Moro, Bari, Italy.
Daniela MrenoshkiDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldi Moro, Bari, Italy.
Sandor CsehUniversity of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Giulio AiudiDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldi Moro, Bari, Italy.
Giovanni Michele LacalandraDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldi Moro, Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormalities of the external genitals are an important issue in dog breeding because of the unfavourable qualities and characteristics of breeds, resulting in consistent economic losses. Despite their significance, little scientific attention has been given to these problems. Although there are several reviews on cryptorchidism in dogs, none have described anorchia. Testicular agenesis is a rare reproductive disorder with a congenital origin. Moreover, no author has described the diagnostic procedure for making a definitive diagnosis of anorchia in dogs. It is important to have a well-structured diagnostic scheme to help practical veterinarians make a confirmatory diagnosis. This review article aims to provide an update on canine anorchia diagnosis based on the poor research studies published in recent years. We have also contributed to the pathogenesis of this disorder using human medicine studies. Finally, the review includes therapeutic hypotheses that can be expanded in future studies.

Indexed as

CryptorchidismDog DiseasesGonadal Dysgenesis, 46,XYAnimalsDogsHumansMaleTestisanorchiacryptorchidismdog penisurogenital tract

Identifiers

PMID36597410
PMCPMC10029902
OpenAlexW4313487934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read9
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.