Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597299›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023

The Effects of Offering Freedom to Comply by Pediatricians and Nurses, Using the But-You-Are-Free (BYAF) Technique, on Vaccination Compliance on 185 Parents of Newborn Babies Conducted in Outpatient Clinics in Poland Between January 2022 and July 2022.

Dariusz Doliński, Wojciech Kulesza, Anna Magdalena Rędzio, Paweł Muniak, Marika Guzek, Andrzej Silczuk, Mariusz Gujski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dariusz DolińskiDepartment of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4225-4258
Wojciech KuleszaDepartment of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5457-6396
Anna Magdalena RędzioDepartment of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł MuniakDepartment of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Marika GuzekMedical Projects and Patients' Health, Medical-Diagnostic Center in Siedlce, Siedlce, Poland.
Andrzej SilczukDepartment of Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7048-8094
Mariusz GujskiDepartment of Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate, in outpatient clinics in Poland between January 2022 and July 2022, the effectiveness of the But-You-Are-Free (BYAF) social influence technique by healthcare professionals during interaction with 185 parents deciding about vaccinating (eg, Hexacima, Prevenor 13, Synflorix, Rotateq, Act Hib, Boostrix, Pentaxim, DTP, Imovax, Priorix, MMR, Tetracim, Adacel, Euvax B, Fuvax, FSME, Varilix, Nimenrix, Bexero vaccines) their babies. MATERIAL AND METHODS During an interaction with pediatricians or nurses, the parents were encouraged to vaccinate their babies. In experimental condition (111 interactions), the BYAF technique was employed, and the phrase "But you are free" was added at the end of the conversation. In the control condition (74 interactions), it was not employed. RESULTS In the experimental condition, 71 (64%) participants declared intention to vaccinate their children. In the control condition, it 61 (84%) participants declared intention to vaccinate (the difference in percentages was significant: P=0.006). The number of parents who actually vaccinated their babies in the experimental condition was 92 (83%) and in the control condition it was 70 (95%; P=0.018). CONCLUSIONS The findings showed that participants who were exposed to the BYAF technique declared lower intentions to vaccinate their babies, and vaccinated them less often than those in the control condition. This result critically highlights that this technique should not be employed in the medical settings of pediatric vaccination.

Indexed as

ParentsVaccinationAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChildFreedomHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPediatriciansPoland

Identifiers

PMID36597299
PMCPMC9827711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.