ArticleArchives of physiotherapy2022
The five times sit-to-stand test: safety, validity and reliability with critical care survivors's at ICU discharge.
Article in Archives of physiotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07504185 (Effect of Postoperative Physiotherapy on Postoperative Outcomes of Elderly Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Postoperative Physiotherapy on Postoperative Outcomes of Elderly Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinimetric properties of the core outcome measurement instruments for clinical effectiveness trials of nutritional and metabolic interventions in critical illness (CONCISE).Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Physical Performance as a Predictor of Length of Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery: A Multicenter Prospective Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Radar-Based Assessment of Sit-to-Stand Transitions as Digital Biomarkers of Pain and Physical Decline.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reference values for the five-times-sit-to-stand test: a pooled analysis including 45,470 participants from 14 countries.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Comparing Movement Patterns and Physical Function Between Chronic Low Back Pain Patients With Nociplastic and Nociceptive Pain Categories.JOR spine · 2026Article
- Article
- Post-intensive care syndrome: a state-of-the-art review.Singapore medical journal · 2026Review
- From Force Plates to AI: Establishing Validity and Reliability of a 2D AI-Camera System for Quantifying Sit-to-Stand Power Measurement.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Are we giving too much weight to lean mass loss?Molecular metabolism · 2025Review
- Long-term recovery of sensorimotor functions and prediction of participation in survivors of critical illness: a prospective cohort study.Journal of intensive care · 2025Article
- Beyond the gut: The overlooked impact of constipation on functional mobility and quality of life in community-dwelling elders - a cross-sectional study.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2025Article
- 3D motion capture data into a kinematic composite score for assessing musculoskeletal impairments.Journal of biomechanics · 2025Article
- Sex-based differences in biomechanical function for chronic low back pain and how it relates to pain experience.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Age-related differences across the adult lifespan: a comparison of six field assessments of physical function.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation on Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Keeogo Exoskeleton-Assisted Rehabilitation on Functional Mobility in Older Adults with Multimorbidity: A Single-Arm Pilot Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Comprehensive assessment and progression of health status during neurorehabilitation in survivors of critical illness: a prospective cohort study.Annals of intensive care · 2024Article
- Efficacy of early cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction: Randomized clinical trial protocol.PloS one · 2024Article
- Correction: The five times sit-to-stand test: safety, validity and reliability with critical care survivors's at ICU discharge.Archives of physiotherapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) has been found reliable, safe and valid for measuring healthy adults' lower limb muscle strength and for determining balance control, fall risk, and exercise capacity among older examinees. We believe that the FTSST has the potential to be a straightforward, low cost and valuable tool for identifying muscle disability and functional status following critical illness. The aim of our study was to establish the applicability, safety, and psychometric qualities of FTSST in patients at Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge.
methodsIn our study applicability was determined by assessing the percentage of patients who could perform the test at ICU discharge. Safety was assessed by examining data regarding any exacerbated haemodynamic and respiratory responses or adverse events associated with the test. For assessing FTSST reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement (SEM) and Bland-Altman plot were used. For assessing concurrent validity handgrip strength, ICU length of stay, duration of invasive ventilation, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS3) and age variables were used. For investigating predictive validity, correlations between the FTSST and measures of hospital length of stay and functional independence were evaluated.
resultsOnly 30% of ICU survivors (n = 261 out of 817) were eligible to perform the FTSST and 7% of patients who performed the test (n = 10 out of 142) presented adverse events. Both inter (ICC 0.92 CI95% 0.89-0.94) and intra-rater (ICC 0.95 CI95% 0.93-0.96) reliability were excellent and higher scores were associated with lower muscle strength, longer hospital stay and greater functional impairment at hospital discharge in adult survivors of critical diseases.
conclusionOur results suggest that the FTSST may be applicable only to high-functioning critical care survivors. In this specifical population, FTSST is a safe, easy to perform, valid and reliable measure that can be applied to fall risk and functional recovery management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.