Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597088›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2023

Applications, benefits and challenges of telehealth in India during COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a systematic review.

Eslavath Rajkumar, Aswathy Gopi, Aditi Joshi, Aleena Elizabeth Thomas, N M Arunima, Gosetty Sri Ramya, Prachi Kulkarni, P Rahul, Allen Joshua George, John Romate and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eslavath RajkumarDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3012-0391
Aswathy GopiDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India. 20dppsy02@cuk.ac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5255-8984
Aditi JoshiDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
Aleena Elizabeth ThomasDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
N M ArunimaDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
Gosetty Sri RamyaDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
Prachi KulkarniDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
P RahulDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
Allen Joshua GeorgeHumanities and Applied Sciences, Indian Institute of Management, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9662-9863
John RomateDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0487-7849
John AbrahamSt. John's Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndia, the seventh-largest country in the world and the second-most populated faces enormous challenges when it comes to healthcare. The country's healthcare system was close to collapse due to the detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telehealth, which enables treating patients remotely, played a critical role during these challenging times. This systematic review investigates in detail the role of telehealth during COVID-19 and its application beyond the pandemic.

methodsDatabase searches on PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct and Web of Science were carried out for studies published on telehealth, and articles were included if they focused on any audio or video telehealth consultation during the pandemic in India. Findings were synthesised into three main themes: applications, benefits and challenges of telehealth services. Methodological quality was assessed using JBI critical appraisal tools.

resultsThe initial search on databases yielded 1143 articles. Of those, 19 met the eligibility criteria. Findings highlight the effective utilisation of telehealth across multiple medical specialities. Although insufficient technological infrastructure and other barriers due to the virtual consultation challenge the successful implementation of telehealth in India, it has the potential to bridge the rural-urban healthcare divide with cost-effective and easily accessible services.

conclusionHigh patient/provider satisfaction underscores the need to integrate telehealth into routine healthcare practices in the country. However, the review urges the government and healthcare practitioners to address the telehealth challenges with prime importance to ensure quality healthcare throughout the nation even after the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineHealth FacilitiesHumansPandemicsQuality of Health CareCOVID-19IndiaMobile healthRemote consultationSystematic reviewTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID36597088
PMCPMC9810518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.