ArticleBMC health services research2023
How health care professionals handle limited resources in primary care - an interview study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Building capacity for genomics in primary care: a scoping review of practitioner attitudes, education needs, and enablers.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Participation in the digital transformation of healthcare: a review of qualitative studies.International journal of health care quality assurance · 2024Pooled it
- Experiences of cancer patients in receiving dietary advice from healthcare professionals and of healthcare professionals in providing this advice-a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Pooled it
- Self-management difficulties in Swedish older adults and associations with sociodemographic factors, number of conditions, depression and health status.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Article
- Cardiac Arrest Survivors' Perspectives to Inform the Co-Design of a Web-Based Support and Learning Platform: Qualitative Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Juggling conflicting demands: registered nurses' experiences of goal conflicts in acute illness consultations in primary care - a thematic analysis.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Turning to Service Users for the Understanding of Current and Future Mental Health Services in the Development Process of Research and Practice: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Adequacy of electronic and in-person referrals to endocrinology: a prospective study of primary care and hospital consultations.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Joint latent profiles of workplace violence and burnout among healthcare workers and their associated factors: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
- Disagreeing respectfully: embracing complexity facilitates civil discourse.Canadian medical education journal · 2025Review
- General practitioners' involvement in inpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany: a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Criteria for establishing a centre of excellence in oncology: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Understanding challenges of primary healthcare financial resource allocation in Iran.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Research on the impact of hospital organizational behavior on physicians'patient-centered care.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Healthier together. How arts on prescription can promote psychosocial wellbeing: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Balancing competing rationales in priority-setting in primary healthcare - an interview study on political governance.Journal of health organization and management · 2025Article
- Telemedicine Gatekeeping Over 15,000 Patients from Specialist Consultation Waiting Lists: A Cost-Minimization Study.Telemedicine reports · 2025Article
- Factors influencing implementation of a self-measured blood pressure program in community health centers: an implementation mapping approach.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHealth care systems around the world are struggling with limited resources, in relation to the prevailing health care need. An accessible primary care is an important part of the solution for how to provide affordable care for the population and reduce pressure on the overall health care system such as unnecessary hospital stays and associated costs. As primary care constitutes an important first line of healthcare, the task of prioritising and deciding what to do and for whom lies in practice, primarily with the primary care professionals. Thus, the decisions and behaviour of primary care professionals have a central role in achieving good and equal health in the population. The aim of this study is to explore how primary health care professionals handle situations with limited resources and enhance our knowledge of priorities in practice.
methodsSemi-structured interviews with 14 health care professionals (7 nurses, 7 physicians) working in Swedish primary care were interviewed. Data were analysed inductively with content analysis.
findingsThree main categories were found: Influx of patients; Structural conditions; and Actions. Each category illustrates an important aspect for what primary care professionals do to achieve good and equal care. The influx of patients concerned what the professionals handled in terms of patients' healthcare needs and patient behaviour. Structural conditions consisted of policies and goals set for primary care, competence availability, technical systems, and organisational culture. To handle situations due to limited resources, professionals performed different actions: matching health care needs with professionals' competency, defining care needs to suit booking systems appointments, giving care at the inappropriate health care level, rearranging workhours, and passing on the decision making.
conclusionPriorities in primary care are not, "one fits all" solution. Our study shows that priorities in primary care comprise of ongoing daily processes that are adapted to the situation, context of patient influx, and structural conditions. Healthcare professional's actions for how influx of patients' is handled in relation to limited resources, are created, and shaped within this context which also sets the boundaries for their actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.