Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597047›Full record

SynthesisBMC bioinformatics2023

A gene based combination test using GWAS summary data.

Jianjun Zhang, Xiaoyu Liang, Samantha Gonzales, Jianguo Liu, Xiaoyi Raymond Gao, Xuexia Wang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianjun ZhangDepartment of Mathematics, University of North Texas, 225 Avenue E, Denton, TX, 76201, USA.
Xiaoyu LiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, 909 Wilson Rd Room B601, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Samantha GonzalesDepartment of Mathematics, University of North Texas, 225 Avenue E, Denton, TX, 76201, USA.
Jianguo LiuDepartment of Mathematics, University of North Texas, 225 Avenue E, Denton, TX, 76201, USA.
Xiaoyi Raymond GaoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Biomedical informatics, Division of Human Genetics, Ohio State University, 915 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
Xuexia WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th street, Miami, FL, 33174, USA. xuexwang@fiu.edu.

Funding

Discovery Approach to Ocular HypertensionR01EY027315 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FINI, M ELIZABETH, GAO, XIAOYI RAYMOND · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
NIH HHS R01EY027315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene-based association tests provide a useful alternative and complement to the usual single marker association tests, especially in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The way of weighting for variants in a gene plays an important role in boosting the power of a gene-based association test. Appropriate weights can boost statistical power, especially when detecting genetic variants with weak effects on a trait. One major limitation of existing gene-based association tests lies in using weights that are predetermined biologically or empirically. This limitation often attenuates the power of a test. On another hand, effect sizes or directions of causal genetic variants in real data are usually unknown, driving a need for a flexible yet robust methodology of gene based association tests. Furthermore, access to individual-level data is often limited, while thousands of GWAS summary data are publicly and freely available.

resultsTo resolve these limitations, we propose a combination test named as OWC which is based on summary statistics from GWAS data. Several traditional methods including burden test, weighted sum of squared score test [SSU], weighted sum statistic [WSS], SNP-set Kernel Association Test [SKAT], and the score test are special cases of OWC. To evaluate the performance of OWC, we perform extensive simulation studies. Results of simulation studies demonstrate that OWC outperforms several existing popular methods. We further show that OWC outperforms comparison methods in real-world data analyses using schizophrenia GWAS summary data and a fasting glucose GWAS meta-analysis data. The proposed method is implemented in an R package available at https://github.com/Xuexia-Wang/OWC-R-package

conclusionsWe propose a novel gene-based association test that incorporates four different weighting schemes (two constant weights and two weights proportional to normal statistic Z) and includes several popular methods as its special cases. Results of the simulation studies and real data analyses illustrate that the proposed test, OWC, outperforms comparable methods in most scenarios. These results demonstrate that OWC is a useful tool that adapts to the underlying biological model for a disease by weighting appropriately genetic variants and combination of well-known gene-based tests.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideComputer SimulationGenetic TestingModels, GeneticPhenotypeBurden testCombination testScore testWeighted sum of squared score testWeighted sum statistic

Identifiers

PMID36597047
PMCPMC9811798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.