Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36597037›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

The success of vaginal birth by use of trans-labial ultrasound plus vaginal examination and vaginal examination only in pregnant women with labor induction: a comparative study.

Elmira Nouri-Khasheh-Heiran, Ali Montazeri, Francesco Conversano, Maryam Kashanian, Mahboubeh Rasuli, Maryam Rahimi, Maryam Mirpour, Nahid Akbari

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elmira Nouri-Khasheh-HeiranDepartment of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali MontazeriHealth Metrics Research Center, Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, The Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR), Tehran, Iran. montazeri@acecr.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5198-9539
Francesco ConversanoNational Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce, Italy.
Maryam KashanianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahboubeh RasuliDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam RahimiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam MirpourDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Nahid AkbariDepartment of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Akbari1420@gmail.com.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Science and Culture · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting the success of vaginal delivery is an important issue in preventing adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to compare the success rate of vaginal birth by using trans-labial ultrasound and vaginal examination, and vaginal examination only in pregnant women with labor induction.

methodsThis was a comparative study including 392 eligible pregnant women with labor induction attending to a teaching hospital affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences from April to October 2018 in Tehran, Iran. Women were randomly assigned to two groups; the trans-labial ultrasound plus vaginal examination (group A), and the vaginal examination only (group B). Women were included in the study if they satisfied the following criteria: singleton pregnancy, 37 to 42 weeks of gestational age, fetal head presentation, a living fetus with no abnormalities, uncomplicated pregnancy, and no previous cesarean section or any uterine surgery. We used a partograph for both groups to assess the fetal head position and the fetal head station. In group 1, the Angle of Progression (AoP) and Rotation Angle (RA) were also assessed. Finally, the success and progression of vaginal delivery in two groups were compared by predicting the duration of delivery and mode of delivery.

resultsThe findings showed that 8.68% of women in the trans-labial plus vaginal examination group delivered by cesarean section, while 6.13% in the vaginal examination only group delivered by cesarean section (P = 0.55). In women with cesarean section in positive fetal head stations, Angle of Progression (AoP) was significantly decreased ranging from 90 to 135 degrees compared to women who delivered vaginally (135-180 degrees; P <  0.001). In addition, the Rotation Angle (RA) was significantly decreased in women with cesarean section ranging from 0 to 30 degrees compared to women who delivered vaginally (60-90degrees; P <  0.001). Further analysis indicated that a higher risk of cesarean section was associated with vaginal examination only as compared to trans-labial ultrasound plus vaginal examination (HR: 8.65, P <  0.001).

conclusionAngle of Progression (AoP) and Rotation Angle (RA) indexes might be useful parameters to predict labor progression and successful vaginal delivery among women undergoing labor induction.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionPregnant PeopleFemaleFetusGynecological ExaminationHumansInfant, NewbornIranLabor, InducedLabor PresentationPregnancyAngle of progressionCesarean sectionLabor inductionRotation angleTrans-labial ultrasoundVaginal birthVaginal examination

Identifiers

PMID36597037
PMCPMC9809008
OpenAlexW4313522211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.