ReviewActa neurochirurgica2023
Plexal intraneural perineurioma: an analysis of the clinicoradiologic presentation of this rare variant.
Review in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntraneural (IN) perineurioma is a rare benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor, typically presenting as a painless, progressive mononeuropathy in adolescents. A rare plexal variant has been described, although there are little data describing its clinicoradiologic features. Herein, we present the largest case series of plexal IN perineuriomas reported in the literature.
methodsElectronic medical records (EMR) from 1990 to 2022 from a single academic institution were reviewed for a diagnosis of IN perineurioma involving the brachial or lumbosacral plexus. This identified 18 patients, of which 17 had available MR imaging. We reviewed the EMR for demographics, clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, and surgical outcomes.
resultsEighteen patients were identified. Most patients were male (11/18, 61%) and first developed symptoms at the age of 9.6 years (range 7 months to 55 years). Diagnosis occurred on average at the age of 22 years (4-57 years), which is significantly earlier than distal IN perineurioma (p = 0.0096). All patients (100%, 17/17) presented with motor polyneuropathy and muscular atrophy in multiple nerve distributions, with associated sensory loss (12/17, 71%). Most plexal lesions occurred in the brachial plexus (66%, 12/18). Five (29%, 5/17) patients presented with a hand/foot discrepancy, and 5 patients (29%) had a limb length discrepancy. Five patients underwent tendon transfer, of which two had failure of tendon transfer at most recent follow-up (50%, 2/4) due to progression of neurologic loss affecting the donors. Of patients managed nonoperatively, 87% of patients (6/7) with follow-up information demonstrated disease progression with worsening motor function or sensory loss, and 2 patients demonstrated progression on imaging at most recent follow-up.
conclusionsPlexal perineurioma represents an uncommon variant of IN perineurioma that presents as a progressive motor and sensory polyneuropathy in childhood or early adolescence. Surgical management remains controversial, and tendon transfer tends to result in poor long-term surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.