Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36596931›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

rxCOV is a quantitative metric for assessing immunoassay analyte fidelity.

Rhonda M Brand, Danielle Pitlor, E Jeffrey Metter, Beth Dudley, Eve Karloski, Ashley Zyhowski, Randall E Brand, Shikhar Uttam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rhonda M BrandDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Danielle PitlorDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
E Jeffrey MetterDepartment of Neurology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA.
Beth DudleyDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Eve KarloskiDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ashley ZyhowskiMagee Women's Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Randall E BrandDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Shikhar UttamUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. shf28@pitt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunoassay based bioanalytical measurements are widely used in a variety of biomedical research and clinical settings. In these settings they are assumed to faithfully represent the experimental conditions being tested and the sample groups being compared. Although significant technical advances have been made in improving sensitivity and quality of the measurements, currently no metrics exist that objectively quantify the fidelity of the measured analytes with respect to noise associated with the specific assay. Here we introduce ratio of cross-coefficient-of-variation (rxCOV), a fidelity metric for objectively assessing immunoassay analyte measurement quality when comparing its differential expression between different sample groups or experimental conditions. We derive the metric from first principles and establish its feasibility and applicability using simulated and experimental data. We show that rxCOV assesses fidelity independent of statistical significance, and importantly, identifies when latter is meaningful. We also discuss its importance in the context of averaging experimental replicates for increasing signal to noise ratio. Finally, we demonstrate its application in a Lynch Syndrome case study. We conclude by discussing its applicability to multiplexed immunoassays, other biosensing assays, and to paired and unpaired data. We anticipate rxCOV to be adopted as a simple and easy-to-use fidelity metric for performing robust and reproducible biomedical research.

Indexed as

ImmunoassaySignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID36596931
PMCPMC9810650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.