Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36596840›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Comparison of two analyzer measurements focusing on material stiffness among normal, treatment-naïve, and treated glaucoma eyes.

Shuichiro Aoki, Ryo Asaoka, Yuri Fujino, Shunsuke Nakakura, Hiroshi Murata, Yoshiaki Kiuchi

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Analysis of astigmatism type influence onFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Biomechanical properties measured with dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer in central serous chorioretinopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shuichiro AokiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo AsaokaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. rasaoka-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Yuri FujinoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shunsuke NakakuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Hiroshi MurataDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki KiuchiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPHiroshima University · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPSeirei Hamamatsu General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate differences in biomechanical properties focusing on stiffness parameters between normal, treatment-naïve primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and treated POAG eyes. Retrospective case-control study, This study included 46 treatment-naïve POAG eyes, 46 POAG eyes treated with prostaglandin analogues, and 49 normal eyes used as controls; matched in terms of age and axial length. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured using an ocular response analyzer (ORA). Fifteen biomechanical parameters were measured with the Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST), including biomechanical glaucoma factor (BGF) and two stiffness parameters of 'SP A1' and 'stress-strain index (SSI)', which were compared among the three groups. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver-operating curve to discriminate control and treatment-naïve POAG eyes were calculated for BGF and CH. Treatment-naïve POAG eyes had higher 'SSI' than normal eyes even after controlling for IOP (p < 0.05, Tukey-Cramer test). Treated POAG eyes had significantly lower CRF, and higher BGF than treatment-naïve POAG eyes. There were also significant differences in CH or SP A1 among the three groups. BGF and CH had similar AUC values (0.61 and 0.59). Treatment-naïve POAG eyes had stiffer corneas compared to normal eyes, which seemed to result from the material/structure of the cornea rather than higher intraocular pressure. Antiglaucoma topical medication alters biomechanical properties measured with Corvis ST. These results are important for understanding the pathogenesis and improving the management of POAG.

Indexed as

Glaucoma, Open-AngleBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesCorneaElasticityHumansIntraocular PressureRetrospective StudiesTonometry, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID36596840
PMCPMC9810725
OpenAlexW4313528123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.