Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36596677›Full record

ReviewInfection & chemotherapy2022

Clinical Utility of Procalcitonin on Antibiotic Stewardship: A Narrative Review.

Jong Hun Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection & chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Utility of Procalcitonin in Clinical Practice.Journal of Brown hospital medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jong Hun KimDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea. smonti1976@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6703-5804
CHA University Bundang Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Procalcitonin (PCT) was discovered as a useful marker for bacterial infection. Following its discovery, there have been a substantial number of clinical studies conducted to evaluate the presence of bacterial infections, and to guide antibiotic treatment by the stratified levels of PCT. Clinical evidence suggests that antibiotic treatment by PCT-guided antibiotic stewardship has been associated with a reduction in antibiotic usage without an increase in adverse outcomes. The use of PCT was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States of America in 2017 to guide antibiotic treatment in sepsis and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). In Korea, the use of PCT for sepsis and for pneumonia was approved in 2015 and 2022, respectively. This review will discuss the clinical utility of PCT on antibiotic stewardship in the management of sepsis and LRTIs including pneumonia.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial stewardshipPneumoniaProcalcitoninRespiratory tract infectionSepsis

Identifiers

PMID36596677
PMCPMC9840962
OpenAlexW4312865375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.