ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2023
Inferring the interaction rules of complex systems with graph neural networks and approximate Bayesian computation.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Misspecification-robust likelihood-free inference in high dimensions.Computational statistics · 2025Article
- Applying collective motion models to study discordant individual behaviours within a school of fish.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Inferring the interaction rules of complex systems with graph neural networks and approximate Bayesian computation.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inferring the underlying processes that drive collective behaviour in biological and social systems is a significant statistical and computational challenge. While simulation models have been successful in qualitatively capturing many of the phenomena observed in these systems in a variety of domains, formally fitting these models to data remains intractable. Recently, approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) has been shown to be an effective approach to inference if the likelihood function for a model is unavailable. However, a key difficulty in successfully implementing ABC lies with the design, selection and weighting of appropriate summary statistics, a challenge that is especially acute when modelling high dimensional complex systems. In this work, we combine a Gaussian process accelerated ABC method with the automatic learning of summary statistics via graph neural networks. Our approach bypasses the need to design a model-specific set of summary statistics for inference. Instead, we encode relational inductive biases into a neural network using a graph embedding and then extract summary statistics automatically from simulation data. To evaluate our framework, we use a model of collective animal movement as a test bed and compare our method to a standard summary statistics approach and a linear regression-based algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.