Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36596347›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2023

Analysis of a Biopsy-Based Genomic Classifier in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Meta-Analysis of the NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9202, 9413, and 9902 Phase 3 Randomized Trials.

Paul L Nguyen, Huei-Chung Rebecca Huang, Daniel E Spratt, Elai Davicioni, Howard M Sandler, William U Shipley, Jason A Efstathiou, Jeffry P Simko, Alan Pollack, Adam P Dicker and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 18 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul L NguyenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: paul_nguyen@dfci.harvard.edu.
Huei-Chung Rebecca HuangGenomeDx Inc, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, California; Veracyte, South San Francisco CA.
Daniel E SprattDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UH Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Elai DavicioniDecipher Biosciences, San Diego, California; Veracyte, South San Francisco CA.
Howard M SandlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
William U ShipleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jason A EfstathiouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeffry P SimkoDepartment of Pathology, UCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion, San Francisco, California.
Alan PollackDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Adam P DickerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mack RoachDepartment of Pathology, UCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion, San Francisco, California.
Seth A RosenthalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services, Roseville, California.
Kenneth L ZeitzerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Einstein Medical Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lucas C MendezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada.
Alan C HartfordDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center/Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
William A HallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Anand B DesaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio.
Rachel A RabinovitchDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado.
Christopher A PetersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northeast Radiation Oncology Center, Dunmore, Pennsylvania.
Joseph P RodgersNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center.
Phuoc TranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Felix Y FengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Medical Center-Mission Bay, San Francisco, California.
University of California San Francisco Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCancer Care Ontario · CACedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCoherus BioSciences (United States) · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USEinstein Medical Center Philadelphia · USFroedtert Hospital · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNortheast Radiation Oncology Center · USNRG Oncology · USSumma Health System · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Miami · USVeracyte (United States) · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Elaina Harper · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
Tumor Biology Research ProgramP30CA240139 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI George S. Grills · 2019 to 2026
$24.1M
NSABP Biological Specimen BanksU24CA114732 · NCI · NSABP FOUNDATION, INC. · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 2005 to 2014
$9.4M
Resource Sharing CoreU54CA273956 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Phuoc T. Tran · 2022 to 2026
$8.9M
NCI National Clinical Trials Network - Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233324 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ANTHONY D ELIAS · 2019 to 2026
$5.2M
Biomarker Approaches to Individualizing Systemic Therapy for High Risk Prostate CancerR01CA240582 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FENG, FELIX YI-CHUNG, NGUYEN, PAUL L · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA240139NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240582NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDecipher is a genomic classifier (GC) prospectively validated postprostatectomy. We validated the performance of the GC in pretreatment biopsy samples within the context of 3 randomized phase 3 high-risk definitive radiation therapy trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prespecified analysis plan (NRG-GU-TS006) was approved to obtain formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from biopsy specimens from the NRG biobank from patients enrolled in the NRG/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9202, 9413, and 9902 phase 3 randomized trials. After central review, the highest-grade tumors were profiled on clinical-grade whole-transcriptome arrays and GC scores were obtained. The primary objective was to validate the independent prognostic ability for the GC for distant metastases (DM), and secondary for prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall survival (OS) with Cox univariable and multivariable analyses.

resultsGC scores were obtained on 385 samples, of which 265 passed microarray quality control (69%) and had a median follow-up of 11 years (interquartile range, 9-13). In the pooled cohort, on univariable analysis, the GC was shown to be a prognostic factor for DM (per 0.1 unit; subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.41; P < .001), PCSM (sHR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.16-1.41; P < .001), and OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.22; P < .001). On multivariable analyses, the GC (per 0.1 unit) was independently associated with DM (sHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.09-1.36), PCSM (sHR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.39), and OS (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.20) after adjusting for age, Prostate Specific Antigen, Gleason score, cT stage, trial, and randomized treatment arm. GC had similar prognostic ability in patients receiving short-term or long-term androgen-deprivation therapy, but the absolute improvement in outcome varied by GC risk.

conclusionsThis is the first validation of a gene expression biomarker on pretreatment prostate cancer biopsy samples from prospective randomized trials and demonstrates an independent association of GC score with DM, PCSM, and OS. High-risk prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease state, and GC can improve risk stratification to help personalize shared decision making.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsBiopsyGenomicsHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAndrogen AntagonistsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID36596347
PMCPMC10281690
OpenAlexW4313398715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.