ArticlePLoS biology2023
Support academic access to automated cloud labs to improve reproducibility.
Article in PLoS biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Laboratory Security Tiers: a framework for evaluating and mitigating biosecurity risks from latent capabilities.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Transforming microfluidics for single-cell analysis with robotics and artificial intelligence.Lab on a chip · 2025Review
- Machine learning-led semi-automated medium optimization reveals salt as key for flaviolin production in Pseudomonas putida.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Critical Assessment of Protein Engineering (CAPE): A Student Challenge on the Cloud.ACS synthetic biology · 2024Article
- Open and remotely accessible Neuroplatform for research in wetware computing.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Software System Design to Support Scale in Mammalian Cell Line Engineering.Engineering biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cloud labs, where experiments are executed remotely in robotic facilities, can improve the reproducibility, accessibility, and scalability of experimental biology. Funding and training programs will enable academics to overcome barriers to adopting such technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.