Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36595492›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2023

Evidence That Event Boundaries Are Access Points for Memory Retrieval.

Sebastian Michelmann, Uri Hasson, Kenneth A Norman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Role of Event Number and Duration in Time-Compressed Memory Replay.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sebastian MichelmannPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University.ORCID 0000-0002-5717-586X
Uri HassonPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University.
Kenneth A NormanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University.

Funding

Neural dynamics supporting integration and recall over long timescales during natural continuous inputR01MH112357 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI HASSON, URI, NORMAN, KENNETH A · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When recalling memories, we often scan information-rich continuous episodes, for example, to find our keys. How does our brain access and search through those memories? We suggest that high-level structure, marked by event boundaries, guides us through this process: In our computational model, memory scanning is sped up by skipping ahead to the next event boundary upon reaching a decision threshold. In adult Mechanical Turk workers from the United States, we used a movie (normed for event boundaries; Study 1,

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAdultBrainHumansMental Recallepisodic memoryevent cognitionmemory replaymemory search

Identifiers

PMID36595492
PMCPMC10152118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.