Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36595371›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2023

Clinical and epidemiologic features of SARS-CoV-2 in dogs and cats compiled through national surveillance in the United States.

Amanda Y Liew, Ann Carpenter, Taylor A Moore, Ryan M Wallace, Sarah A Hamer, Gabriel L Hamer, Rebecca S B Fischer, Italo B Zecca, Edward Davila, Lisa D Auckland and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda Y Liew1CDC, Atlanta, GA.
Ann Carpenter1CDC, Atlanta, GA.
Taylor A Moore1CDC, Atlanta, GA.
Ryan M Wallace1CDC, Atlanta, GA.
Sarah A Hamer2Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Gabriel L Hamer3Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Rebecca S B Fischer4School of Public Health, Texas A&M University College Station, TX.
Italo B Zecca1CDC, Atlanta, GA.
Edward Davila2Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Lisa D Auckland2Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Jane A Rooney5Veterinary Services, APHIS, USDA, Fort Collins, CO.
Mary Lea Killian6National Veterinary Services Laboratories, APHIS, USDA, Ames, IA.
Rachel M Tell6National Veterinary Services Laboratories, APHIS, USDA, Ames, IA.
Steven I Rekant7Veterinary Services, APHIS, USDA, Riverdale, MD.
Sierra D Burrell7Veterinary Services, APHIS, USDA, Riverdale, MD.
Ria R Ghai1CDC, Atlanta, GA.
Casey Barton Behravesh1CDC, Atlanta, GA.
Companion Animals Working Group
CDC Foundation · USTexas A&M University · USAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USNational Animal Disease Center · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize clinical and epidemiologic features of SARS-CoV-2 in companion animals detected through both passive and active surveillance in the US. ANIMALS: 204 companion animals (109 cats, 95 dogs) across 33 states with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections between March 2020 and December 2021. PROCEDURES: Public health officials, animal health officials, and academic researchers investigating zoonotic SARS-CoV-2 transmission events reported clinical, laboratory, and epidemiologic information through a standardized One Health surveillance process developed by the CDC and partners.

resultsAmong dogs and cats identified through passive surveillance, 94% (n = 87) had reported exposure to a person with COVID-19 before infection. Clinical signs of illness were present in 74% of pets identified through passive surveillance and 27% of pets identified through active surveillance. Duration of illness in pets averaged 15 days in cats and 12 days in dogs. The average time between human and pet onset of illness was 10 days. Viral nucleic acid was first detected at 3 days after exposure in both cats and dogs. Antibodies were detected starting 5 days after exposure, and titers were highest at 9 days in cats and 14 days in dogs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results of the present study supported that cats and dogs primarily become infected with SARS-CoV-2 following exposure to a person with COVID-19, most often their owners. Case investigation and surveillance that include both people and animals are necessary to understand transmission dynamics and viral evolution of zoonotic diseases like SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesCOVID-19Dog DiseasesAnimalsCatsDogsHumansPetsSARS-CoV-2United StatesZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID36595371
PMCPMC10038921
OpenAlexW4313453458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.