Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36595345›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2023

Practical Considerations for Developing Clinical Natural Language Processing Systems for Population Health Management and Measurement.

Suzanne Tamang, Marie Humbert-Droz, Milena Gianfrancesco, Zara Izadi, Gabriela Schmajuk, Jinoos Yazdany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Exploring ChatGPT 3.5 for structured data extraction from oncological notes.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  10. Deploying a national clinical text processing infrastructure.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suzanne TamangDivision of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2077-4620
Marie Humbert-DrozDivision of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6814-544X
Milena GianfrancescoDivision of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8351-4626
Zara IzadiDivision of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1867-0905
Gabriela SchmajukDivision of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2687-5043
Jinoos YazdanyDivision of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3508-4094

Funding

RESOURCE-BASED CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF PRECISION MEDICINE IN RHEUMATOLOGYP30AR070155 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Mary C Nakamura · 2016 to 2026
$8.2M
Advancing Safety Process Innovation in Rheumatology (ASPIRE)R01HS028024 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI YAZDANY, JINOOS · 2022 to 2025
$1.6M
ASPIRE: Advancing Safety Process Innovation in RheumatologyR01HS024412 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI YAZDANY, JINOOS · 2015 to 2017
$1.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experts have noted a concerning gap between clinical natural language processing (NLP) research and real-world applications, such as clinical decision support. To help address this gap, in this viewpoint, we enumerate a set of practical considerations for developing an NLP system to support real-world clinical needs and improve health outcomes. They include determining (1) the readiness of the data and compute resources for NLP, (2) the organizational incentives to use and maintain the NLP systems, and (3) the feasibility of implementation and continued monitoring. These considerations are intended to benefit the design of future clinical NLP projects and can be applied across a variety of settings, including large health systems or smaller clinical practices that have adopted electronic medical records in the United States and globally.

Indexed as

clinical decision supportclinical natural language processingelectronic health recordsinformation extractionpopulation health science

Identifiers

PMID36595345
PMCPMC9846439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.