Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36595274›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023

Measuring Retinal Thickness and Visual Acuity in Eyes with Different Types of Astigmatism in a Cohort of Hong Kong Chinese Adults.

Dong Liang, Tsz-Wing Leung, Chea-Su Kee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Urban-Rural and School-Type Disparities in the Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia in South India.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Regional choroidal perfusion deficits and vector-based choroidal associations in adolescent astigmatism.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dong LiangSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Tsz-Wing LeungSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Chea-Su KeeSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate optical coherence tomography (OCT)-measured retinal thickness (RT) and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) in eyes with different types of astigmatism. Methods: This is a case-control study of 101 participants stratified into With-The-Rule (WTR; n = 41), Against-The-Rule (ATR; n = 25), and control (n = 35) groups by noncycloplegic subjective refraction. Inclusion criteria were ages between 18 and 45 years, spherical-equivalent (SE) refraction ≥-10.00 diopters (D), negative cylindrical power (CYL) ≤-0.75 D with axes of 0 to 30 degrees/150 to 180 degrees for WTR and 60 to 120 degrees for ATR, or CYL ≥-0.25 D for controls. Participants suffering from ocular diseases related to retinal defects, having a history of ocular surgery, with BCDVA >0.10 LogMAR, or poor OCT imaging quality were excluded. Fovea-centered scans were performed using spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT), and RT automatically measured by the inbuilt software. Only right eyes were analyzed. Groups were matched for age, gender, SE, axial length, and corneal curvature. Results: One-way ANOVA showed a significant difference in both BCDVA (P = 0.039) and macular RT (P = 0.028) among the three groups. Bonferroni's post hoc test revealed statistically significant between-group differences in BCDVA (WTR vs. controls, P = 0.041), as well as in RT at inner-nasal (WTR vs. ATR, P = 0.034) and outer-temporal subfields (WTR vs. controls, P = 0.042). BCDVA was positively associated with macular RT (r = 0.206, P = 0.041) after adjusting for age, gender, and axial length. Conclusions: Greater RT and poorer BCDVA were found in eyes with WTR astigmatism. Our findings suggest that the effect of astigmatism on retinal thickness and BCDVA may vary depending on not only magnitude, but also axis of astigmatism.

Indexed as

AstigmatismAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesEast Asian PeopleHong KongHumansMiddle AgedRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID36595274
PMCPMC9819738
OpenAlexW4313524307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.