Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36595204›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2023

Psychometric properties of Iowa Anesthesia Satisfaction Scale Turkish version.

Ali Özgül Saltalı, Tuba Çatak, Ebru Çanakçı

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali Özgül SaltalıDepartment of Anesthesiology, Konya Numune Hospital, Hastaneler Street, Konya, 42060, Turkey. saltal1980@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6098-3676
Tuba ÇatakDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ordu University Education and Research, Ordu, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8370-0739
Ebru ÇanakçıDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2093-9229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS) is a valid and reliable measurement tool developed to evaluate patient satisfaction with anesthesia care during different surgical interventions. It is adapted to various languages and used in many studies. Considering the satisfaction of the patient with anesthesia applied in surgical procedures, the presence of such a measurement tool is crucial.

aimFrom this point of view, the study aimed to evaluate psychometric properties of the ISAS by adapting it to Turkish culture.

methodsIn this study, a descriptive, methodological and cross-sectional design was used. A total of 210 patients who underwent surgery under general or regional anesthesia were in the study.

resultsISAS Turkish version (ISAS-T) shows good reliability which is obvious with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.80. The correlation levels of the items with the ISAS total score were calculated between .45 and .73. Test-retest reliability was calculated as 0.83. CFA analysis was applied to the one-dimensional 11-item final version of ISAS. The uni-dimensionality of the 11-item scale was confirmed on a Turkish patient sample. The fit indices for the model obtained were calculated as χ

conclusionBased on the psychometric evaluation, ISAS-T is a valid and reliable measurement tool for measuring patient satisfaction with anesthesia applied during different surgical procedures.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnesthesia satisfactionPsychometric propertiesScale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.