Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36595203›Full record

ReviewOncology and therapy2023

Role of Perioperative Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Saachi Chhaya, Isabella Watts, Kenrick Ng, Rami Mustapha, Thomas Powles, Anand Sharma, Nikhil Vasdev

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Saachi ChhayaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. Schhaya19@hotmail.com.
Isabella WattsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Kenrick NgDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Rami MustaphaSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Thomas PowlesBarts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Anand SharmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
Nikhil VasdevHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
University College London · GBKing's College London · GBMount Vernon Cancer Centre · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aim to describe and highlight the current use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treatment landscape, particularly focusing on the perioperative setting. We provide a comprehensive review of key trials of the use of ICI in the perioperative setting, discussing trial outcomes and limitations and reviewing the role of biomarkers.

introductionICIs have recently been integrated into the treatment algorithm for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. More than 30 published studies have investigated the role of these agents in the radical treatment of MIBC. Some studies have demonstrated conflicting results, affecting widespread adoption in clinical practice.

methodsWe performed a narrative overview of the literature from databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, European society of Medical Oncology/American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Proceedings, and clinicaltrials.gov databases up until December 2021. DISCUSSION: We described the results of key trials in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, some of the reasons for conflicting study results, and the implications for clinical practice. Relevant biomarkers in the field are discussed, alongside a brief overview of the immune microenvironment in bladder cancer.

conclusionsPerioperative ICIs have shown promising efficacy with low toxicity in the neoadjuvant setting. The two large trials in the adjuvant setting have been contradictory. The efficacy of perioperative ICIs combined with favorable tolerability and better toxicity profile compared with chemotherapy, with the potential for biomarker-driven patient selection, may lead to a change in future practice. There is, however, a lack of long-term survival and toxicity data for those treated with ICIs, and this needs to be developed further to demonstrate an added survival benefit by using ICIs.

Indexed as

AdjuvantBiomarkersCheckpoint inhibitorImmunotherapyMuscle invasive bladder cancerNeoadjuvant

Identifiers

PMID36595203
PMCPMC9935774
OpenAlexW4313454578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.