Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36595147›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2023

Long-Term Matched Comparison of Primary and Revisional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Nasser Sakran, Sharon Soued, Keren Hod, Jane N Buchwald, Kim Soifer, Yafit Kessler, Dana Adelson, Reut Biton, David Goitein, Asnat Raziel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cost-Effectiveness of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery on Antidiabetic Reimbursement: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nasser SakranAssuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. sakranas@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6658-8981
Sharon SouedThe Azrieli Faculty of Medicine Safed, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Keren HodAssuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Jane N BuchwaldDivision of Scientific Research Writing, Medwrite Medical Communications, Maiden Rock, WI, USA.
Kim SoiferAssuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yafit KesslerAssuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Dana AdelsonAssuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Reut BitonAssuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
David Goitein *Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Asnat Raziel *Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReports of long-term (> 5-15-year) outcomes assessing the safety and efficacy of primary revisional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are few.

methodsRetrospective long-term comparisons of primary (pLSG) and revisional (rLSG) procedures were matched for gender, age ± 5 years, and body mass index (BMI) ± 5 kg/m

resultsBetween May 1, 2006, and December 31, 2016, 194 matched patients with severe obesity (mean BMI 44.1 ± 6.7 kg/m

conclusionsThere were no significant differences in long-term weight loss or associated medical condition outcomes in matched pLSG and rLSG patients.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2LaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric/metabolic surgeryLong-termMatched caseObesityRevisionSleeve gastrectomyWeight regain

Identifiers

PMID36595147
PMCPMC9809525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.