Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36595138›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2023

The effect of altruism on COVID-19 vaccination rates.

Luis Á Hierro, David Patiño, Pedro Atienza, Antonio J Garzón, David Cantarero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luis Á HierroDepartment of Economics and Economic History, University of Sevilla, Avda. Ramón y Cajal, S/N, 41018, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5868-5589
David PatiñoDepartment of Economics and Economic History, University of Sevilla, Avda. Ramón y Cajal, S/N, 41018, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3313-561X
Pedro AtienzaDepartment of Economics and Economic History, University of Sevilla, Avda. Ramón y Cajal, S/N, 41018, Seville, Spain. atienza@us.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-511X
Antonio J GarzónDepartment of Economics and Economic History, University of Sevilla, Avda. Ramón y Cajal, S/N, 41018, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-4926
David CantareroDepartment of Economics, Universidad de Cantabria, Research Group on Health Economics and Health Services Management-Marqués de Valdecilla Research Institute (IDIVAL), Avda. de los Castros S/N, 39005, Santander, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8082-0639
Universidad de Sevilla · ESUniversidad de Cantabria · ES

Funding

Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla UC 10.3834.64001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter the emergence of the first vaccines against the COVID-19, public health authorities have promoted mass vaccination in order to achieve herd immunity and reduce the effects of the disease. Vaccination rates have differed between countries, depending on supply (availability of resources) and demand (altruism and resistance to vaccination) factors.

methodsThis work considers the hypothesis that individuals' health altruism has been an important factor to explain the different levels of vaccination between countries, using the number of transplants as a proxy for altruism. Taking European Union's countries to remove, as far as possible, supply factors that might affect vaccination, we carry out cross-sectional regressions for the most favorable date of the vaccination process (maximum vaccination speed) and for each month during the vaccination campaign.

resultsOur findings confirm that altruism has affected vaccination rates against the COVID-19. We find a direct relationship between transplants rates (proxy variable) and vaccination rates during periods in which the decision to be vaccinated depended on the individual's choice, without supply restrictions. The results show that other demand factors have worked against vaccination: political polarization and belonging to the group of countries of the former Eastern bloc.

conclusionsAltruism is a useful tool to define future vaccination strategies, since it favors the individuals' awareness for vaccination.

Indexed as

AltruismCOVID-19; hesitancyExternalityHerd immunityPublic healthVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36595138
PMCPMC9807973
OpenAlexW4313488615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.