ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
An artificial intelligence approach to classify pathogenic fungal genera of fungal keratitis using corneal confocal microscopy images.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Climate change impact on disease emergence and antimicrobial resistance: A perspective on transmission and detection.iScience · 2026Review
- Fungal morphotype detection and quantification in microscopic images with TU_MyCo-vision: a user-friendly deep learning object detection tool.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Advancements in Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnostic Tools Used to Detect Fungal Infections: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Application in Cornea and External Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence derived grading of mustard gas induced corneal injury and opacity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fusarium Genome Sequencing and Assembly.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- An explainable unsupervised learning approach for anomaly detection on cornealFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Research on interdisciplinary measurement and evolutionary path in the field of ophthalmology.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Article
- AI-driven strategies for advancing corneal cell therapy: a promising frontier.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in corneal diseases: A narrative review.Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2024Review
- Diagnostic performance of deep learning for infectious keratitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Artificial-Intelligence-Enhanced Analysis of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Corneal Diseases: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Infectious Keratitis: Where Are We Now?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Applications of Computer Vision for Infectious Keratitis: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmology scienceReview
- Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches for Automated Fungal Keratitis Diagnosis Using In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Images.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFungal keratitis is a common cause of blindness worldwide. Timely identification of the causative fungal genera is essential for clinical management. In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) provides useful information on pathogenic genera. This study attempted to apply deep learning (DL) to establish an automated method to identify pathogenic fungal genera using IVCM images.
methodsDeep learning networks were trained, validated, and tested using a data set of 3364 IVCM images that collected from 100 eyes of 100 patients with culture-proven filamentous fungal keratitis. Two transfer learning approaches were investigated: one was a combined framework that extracted features by a DL network and adopted decision tree (DT) as a classifier; another was a complete supervised DL model which used DL-based fully connected layers to implement the classification.
resultsThe DL classifier model revealed better performance compared with the DT classifier model in an independent testing set. The DL classifier model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) of 0.887 with an accuracy of 0.817, sensitivity of 0.791, specificity of 0.831, G-mean of 0.811, and F1 score of 0.749 in identifying Fusarium, and achieved an AUC of 0.827 with an accuracy of 0.757, sensitivity of 0.756, specificity of 0.759, G-mean of 0.757, and F1 score of 0.716 in identifying Aspergillus.
conclusionThe DL model can classify Fusarium and Aspergillus by learning effective features in IVCM images automatically. The automated IVCM image analysis suggests a noninvasive identification of Fusarium and Aspergillus with clear potential application in early diagnosis and management of fungal keratitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36595127What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.