Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36595119›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2023

Therapeutic potential of low dose ionizing radiation against cancer, dementia, and diabetes: evidences from epidemiological, clinical, and preclinical studies.

Jagdish Gopal Paithankar, Subash Chandra Gupta, Anurag Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases: benefits and long-term risks.International journal of radiation biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jagdish Gopal PaithankarNitte (Deemed to Be University), Nitte University Centre for Science Education and Research (NUCSER), Division of Environmental Health and Toxicology, Kotekar-Beeri Road, Deralakatte, Mangaluru, 575018, India.
Subash Chandra GuptaDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India. sgupta@bhu.ac.in.
Anurag SharmaNitte (Deemed to Be University), Nitte University Centre for Science Education and Research (NUCSER), Division of Environmental Health and Toxicology, Kotekar-Beeri Road, Deralakatte, Mangaluru, 575018, India. anuragsharma@nitte.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0636-0643

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, IN 09/1257(0001)/2019-EMR-IIndian Council of Medical Research 36/8/2020/TOXI/BMS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing use of ionizing radiation (IR)-based diagnostic and treatment methods has been linked to increasing chronic diseases among patients and healthcare professionals. However, multiple factors such as IR dose, dose-rate, and duration of exposure influence the IR-induced chronic effects. The predicted links between low-dose ionizing radiation (LDIR) and health risks are controversial due to the non-availability of direct human studies. The studies pertaining to LDIR effects have importance in public health as exposure to background LDIR is routine. It has been anticipated that data from epidemiological and clinical reports and results of preclinical studies can resolve this controversy and help to clarify the notion of LDIR-associated health risks. Accumulating scientific literature shows reduced cancer risk, cancer-related deaths, curtailed neuro-impairments, improved neural functions, and reduced diabetes-related complications after LDIR exposure. In addition, it was found to alter evolutionarily conserved stress response pathways. However, the picture of molecular signaling pathways in LDIR responses is unclear. Besides, there is limited/no information on biomarkers of epidemiological LDIR exposure. Therefore, the present review discusses epidemiological, clinical, and preclinical studies on LDIR-induced positive effects in three chronic diseases (cancer, dementia, and diabetes) and their associated molecular mechanisms. The knowledge of LDIR response mechanisms may help to devise LDIR-based therapeutic modalities to stop disease progression. Modulation of these pathways may be helpful in developing radiation resistance among humans. However, more clinical evidence with additional biochemical, cellular, and molecular data and exploring the side effects of LDIR are the major areas of future research.

Indexed as

DementiaDiabetes MellitusNeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansRadiation, IonizingCancerDementiaDiabetesEpidemiologyLow dose ionizing radiation

Identifiers

PMID36595119
PMCPMC9808703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.