Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36594634›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2023

Responses of model cortical neurons to temporal interference stimulation and related transcranial alternating current stimulation modalities.

Boshuo Wang, Aman S Aberra, Warren M Grill, Angel V Peterchev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Quasistatic approximation in neuromodulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Visualizing interferential stimulation of human brains.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Boshuo WangDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1680-5957
Aman S AberraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4805-541X
Warren M GrillDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5240-6588
Angel V PeterchevDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4385-065X

Funding

Robotically-actuated, low-noise, concurrent TMS-EEG-fMRI systemR01MH127104 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LIU, CHUNLEI, LUSTIG, MICHAEL · 2021 to 2024
$6.5M
Biology and Biophysics of the Cortical Response to Transcranial Magnetic StimulationR01NS117405 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PETERCHEV, ANGEL V, SOMMER, MARC A · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
Rational Design of TMS for NeuromodulationR01NS088674 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PETERCHEV, ANGEL V, SOMMER, MARC A · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH127104NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088674NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAxonsBrainComputer SimulationNeuronscomputational simulationkilohertz stimulationneuron modeltemporal interference stimulationtranscranial alternating current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36594634
PMCPMC9942661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.