Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36593911›Full record

ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab2023

Method validation of multi-element panel in whole blood by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

Amol O Bajaj, Rebecca Parker, Candice Farnsworth, Christian Law, Kamisha L Johnson-Davis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Heavy Metal and Trace Element Biomonitoring Study in a Young Cohort (Aged 18-24) in Istanbul, Turkey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and validation of an ICP-MS method and its application in assessing heavy metals in whole blood samples among occupationally exposed lead smelting plant workers.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amol O BajajARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Rebecca ParkerARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Candice FarnsworthARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Christian LawARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Kamisha L Johnson-DavisDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
ARUP Laboratories (United States) · USARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Analytical methods to measure trace and toxic elements are essential to evaluate exposure and nutritional status. A ten-element panel was developed and validated for clinical testing in whole blood. Retrospective data analysis was conducted on patient samples performed at ARUP Laboratories. Methods: A method was developed and validated to quantify ten elements in whole blood by ICP-MS. Fifty microliters of sample were extracted with 950 μL of diluent containing 1 % ammonium hydroxide, 0.1 % Triton X-100, 1.75 % EDTA along with spiked internal standards. Four calibrators were used for each element and prepared in goat blood to match the patient specimen matrix. Samples were analyzed with an Agilent 7700 ICP-MS with a Cetac MVX 7100 μL Workstation autosampler. Results: The assay was linear for all elements with inter- and intra-assay imprecision less than or equal to 11% CV at the low end of the analytical measurement range (AMR) and less than or equal to 4% CV at the upper end of the AMR for all elements. Accuracy was checked with a minimum of 40 repeat patient samples, proficiency testing samples, and matrix-matched spikes. The linear slopes for the ten elements ranged from 0.94 to 1.03 with intercepts below the AMR and R Conclusions: The multi-element panel was developed to analyze ten elements in whole blood to unify the sample preparation and increase batch run efficiency. The improved analytical method utilized matrix-matched calibrators for accurate quantification to meet regulatory requirements. The assay was validated according to guidelines for CLIA-certified clinical laboratories and was suitable for clinical testing to assess nutritional status and toxic exposure.

Indexed as

AAPCC, American Association of Poison Control CentersAMR, Analytical measurement rangeAs, arsenicBi, bismuthCd, cadmiumCLIA, Clinical Laboratory Improvement AmendmentsCLRW, Clinical Laboratory Reagent WaterCo, cobaltHg, mercuryICP-MSICP-MS, Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryIRB, institutional review boardKED, kinetic energy discriminationLOB, limit of the blankLOD, limit of detectionLOQ, limit of quantitationMethod validationMn, manganeseNH4OH, ammonium hydroxidePb, leadSb, antimonySD, standard deviationTl, thalliumToxic elementsTrace elementsULOQ, upper limit of quantificationWB, Whole bloodWhole bloodZn, zinc

Identifiers

PMID36593911
PMCPMC9803809
OpenAlexW4313478776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.