ArticleThermochimica acta2022
Thermochemical Analysis of Improvised Energetic Materials by Laser-Heating Calorimetry.
Article in Thermochimica acta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detection and characterization of explosives and explosives residues: a review 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thermochemical analysis of six improvised energetic materials was carried out using laser-heating calorimetry to demonstrate the feasibility of this methodology to provide distinctive thermal signatures and information on the material shelf life. The chemicals evaluated were erythritol tetranitrate, hexamethylene triperoxide diamine (HMTD), poor-man's C-4 (blend of potassium chlorate and petroleum jelly), R-salt (represented by 1,3,5-trinitroso-1,3,5-triazinane), triacetone triperoxide (TATP), and urea nitrate. The measurement technique records the temperature rise with time, from which one can estimate the material endothermic/exothermic behavior, energy release rate, and total specific energy release (heating value, enthalpy of explosion), as well as the sample mass rate of change. Measurements were carried out in an inert nitrogen environment at laser heating rates up to 60 K/s with steady-state temperatures reaching about 933 K. Sample initial mass was between 1.0 mg and 4.0 mg. Experiments were carried out with freshly prepared samples, as well as refrigerated samples and those stored at room (laboratory) temperature for three years. Results indicated that the samples reacted rapidly between 0.50 s and 0.75 s, being initiated near the material decomposition temperature. The total specific energy release, using two different thermal-analysis models, was calculated and compared to values available in the literature. One model represents sample reaction and decomposition within the spherical reactor volume, while the second represents reactions emanating from sample in a pan centrally positioned within the sphere; the former model was found to be the more appropriate approach for these faster-reacting energetic materials. The thermal signatures (temperature-time derivatives with temperature) were different for each chemical, a feature that may be important for energetic material identification. The initiation and peak reaction temperatures were found to decrease with increasing initial sample mass. Also, the shelf life for TATP and HMTD was found not to degrade under nonideal conditions after three years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.