ArticleBuilding simulation2022
Effects of mask wearing duration and relative humidity on thermal perception in the summer outdoor built environment.
Article in Building simulation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Infrared Thermographic Evaluation of Facial Thermal Response During Face Mask Wearing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development of an Automobile Indoor Air Quality Grading Based on Acute and Chronic Risk Assessment.Toxics · 2025Article
- Mask-wearing behavior patterns among dental patients in post-pandemic China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the pandemic, face masks are one of the most significant self-protection necessities, but they also cause heat stress. By using the ERA5 (ECMWF Reanalysis 5th Generation) database and the local weather bureau data, the effect of mask wearing on outdoor thermal sensation has been investigated by a survey conducted in the hot summer and cold winter region of eastern China in the summer of 2020. Results show that wearing a face mask for a longer period result in a higher level of discomfort, and the primary source of discomfort is hot and stuffy feelings. The effect of relative humidity is crucial for mask wearers in warm-biased thermal environments, as mean thermal sensation vote (TSV) peaks when environmental relative humidity reaches the range of 70% to 80% and decreases after this range due to the evaporation within the microclimate created by a face mask. Meanwhile, prolonged mask wearing increases participants' hot feelings, especially in warm environments. Specifically, participants wearing face masks for less than 30 min feel hot at a physiological equivalent temperature (PET) value of 34.4 °C, but those who wear them for over 60 min express hot feelings even at a PET value of 24.7 °C. The participants who wear a face mask while walking slowly outdoors have similar thermal sensations to those who do not wear a mask, but are in a higher activity level. The findings demonstrate that mask wearing has a crucial impact on outdoor thermal comfort assessment in a warm-biased outdoor thermal environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.