ArticleHealth information science and systems2023
Embedding-based link predictions to explore latent comorbidity of chronic diseases.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of disease clusters in multimorbidity.Nature communications · 2025Pooled it
- Development of a risk assessment model for multimorbidity of diabetes, hypertension, and coronary heart disease with XGBoost in primary care in Shanghai, China: a retrospective study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Comorbidity progression analysis: patient stratification and comorbidity prediction using temporal comorbidity network.Health information science and systems · 2024Article
- A network-based study reveals multimorbidity patterns in people with type 2 diabetes.iScience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Comorbidity is a term used to describe when a patient simultaneously has more than one chronic disease. Comorbidity is a significant health issue that affects people worldwide. This study aims to use machine learning and graph theory to predict the comorbidity of chronic diseases. Methods: A patient-disease bipartite graph is constructed based on the administrative claim data. The bipartite graph projection approach was used to create the comorbidity network. For the link prediction task, three graph machine learning embedding-based models (node2vec, graph neural networks and hand-crafted approach) with different variants were used on the comorbidity network to compare their performance. This study also considered three commonly used similarity-based link prediction approaches (Jaccard coefficient, Adamic-Adar index and Resource allocation index) for performance comparison. Results: The results showed that the embedding-based hand-crafted features technique achieved outstanding performance compared with the remaining similarity-based and embedding-based models. Especially, the hand-crafted technique with the extreme gradient boosting classifier achieved the highest accuracy (91.67%), followed by the same technique with the Logistic regression classifier (90.26%). For this shallow embedding method, the Jaccard coefficient and the degree centrality of the original chronic disease were the most important features for comorbidity prediction. Conclusion: The proposed framework can be used to predict the comorbidity of chronic disease at an early stage of hospital admission. Thus, the prediction outcome could be valuable for medical practice, giving healthcare providers more control over their services and lowering expenses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.