ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2023
Chest CT in COVID-19 patients: A clinical need.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The ongoing impact of COVID-19 on the clinical education of Australian medical radiation science students.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025Article
- Severity of COVID-19 infection in patients with COVID-19 combined with diabetes.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in a global healthcare crisis. The provision of computed tomography (CT) imaging services by radiology departments for COVID-19 patients poses multiple challenges. Consequently, it is important to explore the clinical need and indications for thoracic CT and whether they subsequently alter patient management.
methodsWe report our experience in this single-centre retrospective cohort study of all confirmed COVID-19 cases admitted during the peak of the 'Delta' variant wave in Australia, and who underwent a chest CT. Clinical indication and patient management plan pre- and post-CT were ascertained.
resultsA total of 92 out of 1403 patients who were admitted with COVID-19 underwent a thoracic CT (73 CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA), 14 CT Chest and five high-resolution CT (HRCT) studies). 72.8% of studies were to evaluate for pulmonary emboli, 16.2% for assessment of COVID-19 pneumonia complications, 5.4% for tuberculosis and 6.5% for other indications. 21 (23%) of these studies resulted in a change in management with two patients having a major change in management (thrombolysis, CT-guided aspiration). Management was altered due to diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), pneumonia, cryptogenic organising pneumonia and other reasons. Of 73 CTPA studies, 11 (15%) patients had evidence of PE.
conclusionIn our centre, thoracic CT in COVID-19 patients were predominantly for the evaluation of PE with other indications being for COVID-19 complications and other cardiopulmonary pathologies. 23% of studies subsequently altered patient management, suggesting there is good clinical need for CT chests for these indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.